A Pandemic American Heresy
Posted by Dave Miller in Bible & Theology, Church & Missions
I am very slow to drop the H-bomb on anyone. I will tell you I disagree with you. I will try to explain why I disagree with your position. But I seldom call people heretics. For me, that is a term reserved for those who hold doctrines that would undermine the very foundation of our faith and nullify the gospel. We should be very careful about using the word.
Understanding that, I assert that there is a heresy that has become rampant, even pandemic, in American Christianity. I call it a heresy because I believe that it nullifies the true gospel of Jesus Christ. It is a very old heresy, one that was prevalent in Old Testament days. But it has taken hold of the very fiber of the American church and it threatens to make us spiritually impotent.
The Old Testament False Prophets
False prophets were always a problem among the people of God. God called prophets to deliver his message, but the false prophets often seduced the people with their soothing words and led the people away from God. As you study the prophets and writings of the Old Testament, you see one consistent marker that identified the false prophets.
Israel and Judah had both turned from the Living God to serve and worship idols. They had sinned against God and he was bringing discipline on them. The true prophets confronted the people with the holiness of God and the depths of their sins. The people often did not like the message of the prophets, so they would throw them in pits, bounce rocks off their heads or separate those heads from their shoulders. They preferred to hear the message of the false prophets.
The false prophets had a more soothing, comforting message. They told people that God was not angry at them. They were his chosen people. He was a God of love and grace, after all. They proclaimed peace with God when God was angry at his people. There are many examples of this in the Prophets. Ezekiel 13:10-11 says, “Precisely because they have misled my people, saying, ‘Peace,’ when there is no peace, and because, when the people build a wall, these prophets smear it with whitewash, say to those who smear it with whitewash that it shall fall!” The false prophets misled the people by proclaiming peace with God without dealing with the sin that caused the problem. They whitewashed sin instead of confronting it. In Lamentations 2:14 the problem is spelled out. “Your prophets have seen for you false and deceptive visions; They have not exposed your iniquity to restore your fortunes, But have seen for you oracles that are false and misleading.” The problem was sin, but they refused to take the unpopular step of confronting sin. Because of that, the people’s fortunes could not be restored. False teaching cannot produce the work of God. Jeremiah 6:14-15 reinforces this. “They have healed the wound of my people lightly, saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ when there is no peace. Were they ashamed when they committed abomination? No, they were not at all ashamed; they did not know how to blush.” They offered peace with God, the blessings of God without repentance. They ignored sin and pretended that God would do the same. They forgot what God said to Isaiah (57:21), “’There is no peace,’ says my God, ‘for the wicked.’” Those who are wicked cannot have peace with God until their sin is dealt with. Repentance precedes blessing.
Paul warned us in 2 Timothy 4:3 that there would come a time when people turned away from sound doctrine and surround themselves with teachers who will give their itching ears what they want to hear. I am afraid that has happened in many churches across America. Rather than calling people to face their sins and receive the forgiveness of Calvary, many try to become pulpit therapists to help people find their best lives now.
Human Purposes
Our flesh is drawn to worldly purposes. We want to be happy and fulfilled. We seek prosperity so that we can buy the things that we think will make us happy. We seek comfort – the absence of pain, suffering, sickness and hardship. We go to great lengths to insulate ourselves from these things. Our culture is saturated with entertainment – a smorgasbord of hedonism. Pleasure has become the god of our hearts. And we seek independence and control over our own lives (and often the lives of those around us). These are human purposes that we often seek.
What we have created in America is false Christianity based on the premise that God exists to help us be more successful as we seek these things. He is here to help us get what we want, do what we please and achieve our own goals and ambitions. God is here to help us find happiness and fulfillment in life.
Dead Men Walking
Nothing could be further from the biblical truth. God does not offer to come and help us be more successful in our lives. He calls us to die! We are to die to self, to sin, to the lives we lived without him. We turn aside from the purposes of our lives and yield to his purposes. We are to “deny himself, take up his cross daily and follow him.” We must present our bodies as living sacrifices. We must be buried with Christ by baptism into death so that we may be raised to walk a new life in him.
The Christian does not seek the rewards of, the approval of or the pleasures of this world. The world is crucified to us and we are crucified to the world. We reject the treasures of earth for those in heaven. Instead of insisting on ease and comfort, we willingly endure hardship to serve the eternal Kingdom of Jesus Christ. We no longer settle for the pleasures of this world but seek something higher and nobler – the glory of God. And when you submit to Christ and his purposes you no longer seek the power and control that those in this world crave. The call to Christ is a call to abandon the purposes of life that have been our focus so that we can embrace the purposes that God has set for us. You only experience the life of God when you turn from the life you had without him.
And we cannot offer this world a gospel of self-fulfillment. The gospel calls us to face our sin and guilt. We cannot offer “peace, peace, when there is no peace.”
An American Heresy
I watched a video today of a famous Baptist pastor telling a crowd of lost people that God just wanted them to be themselves – to figure out who they are and make the most of that. Balderdash! God calls us to die to self and to be conformed to the image of Christ. God does not want me to be myself; he wants me to be like Christ!
I was at a large ministry outreach at which a Christian (and Baptist) celebrity “shared the gospel.” He managed to do that without once mentioning the death of Jesus on the cross as the payment for sin. How do you offer the gospel while ignoring atonement of Christ? You can try to help people build their self-esteem without the atonement. You can try to help them find self-fulfillment and to achieve their goals. But you cannot offer people genuine salvation without taking them to the cross where they are hit in the face with the hard, cold reality of death and sin. Joy only comes in the morning after that dark night of conviction.
Here’s something for us to ponder. In the Old Testament, the true prophets of God confronted the sin among God’s people, even when it made the prophet unpopular or when it offended his audience. It was the false prophets who comforted sinful people by telling them that God accepted them just as they were. The false prophets avoided calling people to repent of sin and tried to make them happy as they were.
When we deal with lost people, are we more like the true prophets of the Old Testament or the false? It is my observation that there is way too much in the modern American church that mimics the methods of the Old Testament false prophets.
We have tried to make the gospel inoffensive. When we do that, we often end up with a gospel that is nothing more than a cheap, impotent imitation. I’m afraid there will be many members of Baptist and other evangelical churches who are shocked when they stand before God and find that the gospel of self-fulfillment they were offered and accepted was a human invention and not a saving faith.
I call that heresy.



John 3: (20) For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. (21) But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God. (NKJV)
I think that this passage really reflects the way the gospel works and why it is rejected. Our mission is not to get people to accept this message (though I am not denying our call to evangelism, apologetics, etc.), but rather to proclaim this message. God is the one who does the changing (v21). Who are we to remove sin from the gospel message?
H-bombs accurately targeted and successfully delivered, sir!
Brother Dave,
Good message my friend,…..
I have found that preaching and teaching through the text of scripture is a sure way to not avoid the truth and exhortation contained in it. Topical oriented messages sometimes are good ways to avoid what the scripture is meaning to convey. So, we should be ready in season and out of season to deliver the Word rightly and in context.
It is definitely fashionable today to tickle the ears of the hearer. Mainly to try and keep a good salary. The tickle soon turns to heresy!
Blessings,
Chris
thank you, gentlemen.
Chris, the strongest argument for text-driven preaching is that you have to deal with the text that is. Unfortunately, people can hop through texts and miss the hard truths, or just gloss over them.
“I watched a video today of a famous Baptist pastor telling a crowd of lost people that God just wanted them to be themselves – to figure out who they are and make the most of that. Balderdash! God calls us to die to self and to be conformed to the image of Christ. God does not want me to be myself; he wants me to be like Christ!”
This is one of those areas of the gospel that provides a holy tension,IMHO. I wholeheartedly agree that we are to be Christlike, but we have to do so within the personality God gave us. I can’t be somebody I’m not, but I can’t be somebody who lives to satisfy my sinful nature either. We must die to self to be fulfilled in Christ, but God can still use aspects of my personality to glorify His name, even my playful sarcasm and tendency to talk too much. So, I agree that we are to strive to be Christ like, but I’m also free to be the person God created me to be. Therein lies the tension.
I use the term “American Folk Religion”. I’m not sure if it’s original, or if I picked it up from somewhere else along the way.
At a funeral recently I sat dumbfounded as the pastor talked about the deceased fishing for catfish in heaven’s river and riding his four-wheeler (pronounced “fourwhiller”) from one cloud to the next at Jesus’ leading. Unbiblical, romantic notions of heaven, but perhaps not heresy. Then she (the pastor!) said, “And I know that _________ would tell you today that if you want to see him again, then you need to know that how you live your life on this side of eternity will determine where you spend the rest of eternity.”
Granted, those are different symptoms than what you’ve described, but symptoms of the same underlying illness. Whether “heresy”, “American Folk Religion”, or Christian Smith’s “therapeutic, moralistic deism”, the root of the problem is a form of Christianity that has lost the gospel.
Great post, Dave. This hits home for me.
The way a false prophet is described in Scripture would seem to be obvious to the naked eye; however, I think there are those who are a little more subtle today. I was in a church where the Bible was preached. The only problem was how the business of the church was executed. The pastor wanted his way in every aspect of every program, including building programs, and his actions in other areas continuously proved to be a contradiction of the Truth he was preaching. He would continuously reference Rick Warren’s quote that, “It’s not about you”, when he was pushing his own personal agenda. That was genius! When I explained this to him in an email, he immediately stopped all communication with me via email and otherwise, avoided me at church and he informed the deacon board that I was spreading lies and starting trouble. I hadn’t even told anyone. In my email to him I requested a meeting alone to discuss the matter in the spirit of Matthew 18:15 and had to ask two (2) additional times with no response and no meeting. The deacons contacted me and wanted to meet and I refused. I hung around from February to July just to watch what would happen and see if he would meet with me. Everything you mentioned that happens to prophets, except real rocks, happened to me during that time. I left in July and sent an email to the pastor, his wife, and the deacons of the reason why I left. That was all I could do to expose his actions and it was done with respect, but, clearly stated my position. Only one deacon, who was a friend of ours, wanted to hear my side of the story since my email contradicted what the deacons were told. He confirmed that the pastor did in fact prepare the deacons with information that would sway their opinion of me. Matthew 18:18 informs us to bind or loose these sins on those who have sinned or repented. I believe our churches have more false prophets today because we do not pursue what God has instructed us to do in these matters. We may not get to follow the three (3) step plan in Matthew 18, but, that may not happen. We simply need to know what to do and do it in the right spirit. God wants the opportunity to take vengeance on these men (or convict them to repentance) who destroy congregations of people and people don’t want to get involved or seem to think we have no part in it. I believe anyone who proclaims the Word and continues to live differently than what he preaches is also a false prophet. We speak more through our walk than our talk. These men need to be corrected openly for their protection and/or for the protection of the church.
I know in my case, it was 20+ years of active church attendance and service, before I really met Jesus, and it took the weight of the guilt over my sin, to bring it about. It changed my life, and it was another few months before I could even tell anyone about it.
When we see ourselves standing over a cross, with a hammer in our hand, and then experience the wave of forgiveness that only the Holy Spirit can bring about, it casts a whole different light on salvation. Particularly in light of a “plan of salvation” that reduces repentance to item #2 on a checklist.
God told Ezekiel that He would be saying “You shall surely die” to people, and somehow we think it’s enough if we tell them, whether or not God ever does.
My mentor Doug Snider told us to beware of “picking green apples”. I don’t wonder that SBD churches (and probably other, too..) have such a tummyache.
What a terrific article. I plan to pass this to every pastor I know. Whenever I hear the mantra “we aren’t changing the message, just the methods”, I try to offer up the stark differences between the old gospel and the new gospel, per Gary Gilley:
“The old gospel was about an offended God; the new gospel is about a wounded us. The old gospel was about sin; the new gospel is about needs. The old gospel was about our need for righteousness; the new gospel is about our need for fulfillment. The old gospel is offensive to those who are perishing; the new gospel is attractive.”
Yes, the message has changed, and the church at large is the worse off for it.
Well presented. You have confirmed so many things. When I reentered the pastorate this spring this was the main focus of my preaching for a month and a half. It seems that God is stirring the hearts of gospel preachers to be bold again and to call out the false prophets that they would be known for their lies.
This is definitely a post to save and share.
Thanks.
Fine article, my friend! May we all guard the treasure of the Gospel by proclaiming it faithfully.
Dave,
Great post, Brother. What you have said this fine day is absolutely the truth. False teachers dont like to preach a bloody cross. They want to be Dr. Phil and Oprah and Joel Osteen. That draws the crowds. Preaching the cross is foolishness to the false teachers, who want to tickle ears.
I’m glad to agree with you on this fine day.
David
Jeff Parsons, I somehow didn’t see your comment. I want you to know, if you are checking back, that I agree with you in general. It is one of those tensions that we have to maintain. Yes, God allows me to be me. But, the problem I have with what was said is that it completely ignored the gospel call to repentance, to be crucified with Christ.
Makes me wonder what it will be like in heaven when we are all perfectly conformed to the image of Christ. Will I have any of the personality (quirkiness? eccentricity?) that I have now? How can we all be “like Christ” and yet individual? That’s the part we just don’t understand now.
Bruce Harp,
What you have described is so common today. I am afraid that the biblical doctrine of pastoral authority is grossly abused. I have made a study of church conflict within my own experience. Often, there is a pastor pursuing his own agenda, acting out his own overblown authority that is at the heart of it.
If we stay on God’s agenda, not our own, this kind of thing is less likely to happen.
Stuart, some of the worst theology you will ever hear is at funerals.
A funeral director once told me, “You preachers undo everything you preach on Sunday when you do funerals.” While he had a works-salvation mentality, the message was powerful.
We preach one thing on Sunday, then at funerals we say any silly thing we can think of to put the person in heaven and to avoid offending anyone.
David: I guess I am the only one to disagree with you here. And yes, I am one who believes sin should be preached. But, the heresies were not that God was a God of grace, but quite the opposite. That was the heresy that Paul was confronting in his ministry. He would preach Christ and the God of grace, false teachers would come along and preach that they were to go back to doing Jewish laws. That was the heresy.
I’m sorry that should be Dave.
My assertion is that if we preach a gospel that does not call people to be crucified with Christ, we are proclaiming a false gospel. We have no right to offer people fellowship with God without repentance from sin.
God’s grace is not seen in ignoring or excusing sin, but in sending the Son to pay for that sin.
What part of tht do you disagree with?
I’m not sure what part Jewish rites and rituals have in this, Debbie. I certainly did not bring them up. I find myself wondering if you actually read what I wrote.
Dave: You wrote this: They told people that God was not angry at them. They were his chosen people. He was a God of love and grace, after all. They proclaimed peace with God when God was angry at his people. There are many examples of this in the Prophets.
Then you wrote: Paul warned us in 2 Timothy 4:3 that there would come a time when people turned away from sound doctrine and surround themselves with teachers who will give their itching ears what they want to hear. I am afraid that has happened in many churches across America. Rather than calling people to face their sins and receive the forgiveness of Calvary, many try to become pulpit therapists to help people find their best lives now.
And I am simply saying that was not the heresy being spread. It was that they had to do things instead of accepting God’s grace. Yes, that includes repentance, it includes our deeds being crucified with Christ, not just our sins.
Debbie, I would encourage you to study the Old Testament prophets. Their consistent message is condemnation of those who offer “peace, peace, when there is no peace.”
Grace is a precious doctrine. However, Paul, the proponent of grace, condemned the abuse of grace that leads us to ignore holiness, righteousness and purity.
Debbie, you said, “And I am simply saying that was not the heresy being spread.”
I maintained that in the OT, the prophets consistently condemned the false prophets for this message of comfort without repentance.
I maintained that in the NT, Paul warned that in the last days there would be teacers who would say what people wanted to hear.
It is true that in the early days of Paul’s ministry he often encountered Judaizers. But I did not refer to them, nor are they the focus of this.
Are you saying that the Judaizers are who Paul was referring to in 2 Timothy 4:3?
Are you saying the OT prophets were engaging Judaizers or that Paul’s prophecy of 2 Timothy was engaging Judaizers?
What is the background of this passage?(2 Tim. 4:3) The world was creeping into the church. Christians were wearing down and getting discouraged. They saw Christians persecuted right in front of them, or heard of such things happening. They began to feel the best thing to do was to give in. They were beginning to ask for and to listen to those who were giving something contrary to what the apostles had given them. It was God’s love and grace for them that they were rejecting.
It was the fact that they did not just hear one person, but jumped from teacher to teacher. They were hearing how works was the answer because they were pure in and of themselves, that the righteousness of their works was what got them right with God. Christ wasn’t even in the picture of their teaching.
That would be a remarkably unique, and in my view fundamentally flawed interpretation of that passage.
First of all, the passage is founded on verse 2 which exhorts teachers to “reprove, rebuke and exhort with all patience and teaching.” the whole point is that these teachers would ignore that which needs to be reproved and rebuked.
It then goes on to describe a future trend in which people would embrace palatable and pleasant error (what their itching ears wanted to hear) rather than the hard truths of scripture. These teaching, though popular and pleasing, are contrary to the scripture and the gospel, which forces us to face the hard facts of sin.
You said that it was God’s love and grace that they were rejecting. That is true, but in the exact opposite of the way you seem to be implying. There is NO mention here of Jewish law or its works. The gospel requires us to “rebuke, reprove and exhort” and they did not want to hear it.
The idea that these teachers were not teaching the love and grace of God enough just cannot be justified exegetically. It seems clear to me (and to all the commentators I read) that we are dealing with teachers who preach popular messages that ignore sin, judgment and the hard truths of the gospel.
The people wanted a message of false love and grace – a message that is prevalent in America today – that presents a wimpy God and a watered-down gospel. Sinful people are drawn to a false message that ignores the holiness of God, ignores the guilt of sin. and twists God’s grace into a lie – as Paul dealt with in Romans 6.
I’m surprised that such a post has engendered so little discussion compared to the weight of the topic. When reading the post-Exilic prophets or even the later pre-Exilic ones like Jeremiah (my personal fave), I am confronted with a culture steeped in complacency. The falseness of the false prophets was not that they preached “another gospel” so much as they refused to address the obvious abuses in a society marked with self-righteousness and satisfaction.
Oh, it’s easy enough for us to spot the sinning homosexuals and lesbians, but what about the covetous, the miserly, the consumerist among us. Is it a sin that there is no difference in how Christian books are marketed and how secular books are marketed? Is it a sin that every new version of the Bible – THE BIBLE, people – comes out with a celebrity endorsement? Or what about when the Bible takes a back seat to the celebrity himself? http://www.lwf.org/site/PageServer?pagename=legacy_bible_home
Oops. Was I supposed to point the finger at us?
But then that is what the prophets were talking about. They were talking to devout, religious, respectable people and telling them that their devotion was a sham, their religion was hollow, and their respectability was only in their own eyes. Sadly, we have lack those voices in our age. And if we were to have them, who would listen?
rick
Rick,
Thank you for your comments.
You dealt with a subject I was concerned with when I wrote this. Some people mistake being self-righteous and judgmental about other people’s sins for preaching the true gospel of repentance.
Dave,
Good post, Dave. This is a serious malady in the Christian world right now and we don’t even see it. It is legalism undiluted because it tells us that there are things that we can to secure happiness and God is seen as a means to an end of another goal (happy life, marriage, family, wealth, success, etc.) instead of the end Himself.
Debbie,
The problem with the American “gospel” (besides the fact that it is not the gospel), is that it doesn’t work. The Purpose Driven/Wonderful Plan method teaches a lie, and we all know who the Father of lies is.
I would ask you to consider if the “Wonder Plan” message would work for these precious saints:
Five Christians killed by Muslim extremists in Pakistan
One who does not take up a cross to follow Him “cannot be my disciple”.
Its amazing how many of the big issues in American christianity have no relevance in the bigger Christian world.
Those Christians called to die for their faith might not find a “God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life” tract too relevant.
Alan, thanks for the comment from one of the SBC’s best bloggers.
I dunno, Dave.
If we told them, “God loves you and he has a wonderful plan for your life. You will die a martyrs death to the honor and glory of the Savior who paid your sin debt on the cross,” we might be surprised.
The trouble is, no one in America seems to have martyrdom as part of their “wonderful plan.” For that matter, are there any issues that today’s American Baptists would allow themselves to be martyrs in the cause of?
Used to be whole families would go to the stake rather than allow their babies to be baptized. Would anyone do that today?
Used to be people would die pledging their allegiance to Jesus Christ rather than the crown or the Roman eagle. Now we see no contradiction in placing a state flag in our church and pledging allegiance to is. Not only that we will pledge allegiance to the flag before we pledge allegiance to the Christian flag. Finally, we will place our country’s flag on the speaker’s right, the place of highest honor, and the Christian flag on the speaker’s left, the place of lesser honor. And we see no contradiction in doing so, nor any spiritual significance in these practices.
Worst of all, we won’t even consider that such practices as above would be viewed by our Baptist and Anabaptist ancestors as rank heresy.
It would be a great movie. Bring Calvin, Luther, Wesley, Spurgeon and others through time to today. Let them watch several hours of “Christian” television, read some of the blogs, attend a megachurch or two and then let them analyse what they have seen.
Dave
That is a good point about having some of the greats watch todays “Christian” TV. One time I did an experiment with myself and stayed away from all secular information like TV, radio, news paper and other forms of outside information. I didn’t even know what tomorrow’s weather was. My full attention was on God’s Word and prayer. When I did return to secular life, I think I could relate to how these men would have felt.
My question: What if we were able to select a group of volunteers in our churches to take on a challenge like that for a month? Then have a return to secular life and allow them to report to the church what they experienced. That would be a different twist to testimony time.
I think, Bruce, that devoted Christians (like us?) would be surprised how much we are influenced by media and entertainment in this world, how great an effect it has on us.
I saw an interesting, and completely off-topic study a while back. They got a certain number of Christian families to turn off their TV’s for a month. Every one of the families talked about how much better their communication and family time was. They raved about the extra time and extra interaction and such.
Then, at the end of the month, every one of them went back to their TV viewing habits. Strange, eh?
Dave,
We truly are a strange group of people. However, we would be better off if we did this on a routine basis. When we are “washed” in the common ways of the world on a daily basis our paridyme is being restructured. Satan works subtlely through the programs he has established to influence our flesh. It is the time we spend in the uncommon Word of God and prayer that new lines are drawn producing kingdom thinking and serving. Maybe those of us who think we are as far right with God are not far enough if these things continue to draw us back. Very good point.
Unfortunately, the word “strange” applies to God’s people all too often.
Dave,
Does your church have a position with my name on it? I would love to serve with you, good sir.
Where were you when we were doing our staff search a year ago? Don’t remember getting your resume!