A Horrifying Devaluing of Human Life … It’s Not Science Fiction

Posted by in Bible & Theology, News & Culture

A few of us remember the cheesy 1976 scifi classic, Logan’s Run.  In the movie, set in a utopian future, children were not born into happy families … they were bred in labs.  When adults reach the age of 30 they must submit to be killed under the pretense of social renewal.  If their sense of self-preservation kicked in and they chose to run, the government police would hunt them down and kill them.  It was a culture obsessed with youth, beauty, and health.  Newborns were unwanted, the elderly were useless and unthinkable.  The government chose who lived and who died.

Welcome to the future.  Two stories in the press over the past week seem to prove that it has arrived.

From CNSNews.com

John P. Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (Obama’s Science Czar) apparently holds a frighteningly unthinkable view of human life.  In 1973 he co-authored the book, Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions, with Stanford professors Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich. The book was published by W.H. Freeman and Company.  On page 235 in chapter 8 of the book, which is titled “Population Limitation,” the reader finds this unbelievable quote:

“The fetus, given the opportunity to develop properly before birth, and given the essential early socializing experiences and sufficient nourishing food during the crucial early years after birth, will ultimately develop into a human being.”

It appears that, according to the scientific minds of the Obama administration, an infant or small child should not even be considered as a full-fledged human being.  One can imagine the implications of such a radical point of view.  Infanticide, “post-birth” abortion, infant euthanasia … horrific …  But it seems that such are the published views of the chief science advisor of the Obama administration.

But these unthinkable views do not end with Dr. Holdren and friends.  In here recent article, “Deadly Doctors,” New York Post writer Betsy McCaughey brought to light the human life position of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel), the health-policy adviser at the White House Office of Management and Budget.  His views on healthcare for the infirm and elderly are shocking, especially in light of the current debate on healthcare overhaul and reform.  McCaughey reports:

Emanuel, however, believes that “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia” (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ’96).

Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.

He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31).

So, according to this key medical adviser in the Obama administration, healthcare for the truly infirm and elderly is wasted money.  Only those who are really healthy and have reasonable expectation of recovery are deserving of the investment of healthcare.

Could it be that such views are only steps away from outright euthanasia of the mentally impaired, terminally ill, and the elderly?

I am simply blown away.  Shocked.  Amazed.  Mortified.  Mystified.

These stories should be reverberating through the American press. These are not kook conspiracy theories.  They are documented views and statements quoted in respectable press outlets.

The people of our country, and certainly the people in our churches, should know about the views of these high-ranking, influential people in the United States Government.

Somehow, I don’t think this is the “change” that the people of the United States bargained for.