The GCR Has Begun!
Posted by Dave Samples in Baptist Life
I am thrilled to be a Southern Baptist! I am both hopeful and prayerful that that true and authentic change is in fact already occurring within our denomination. I’m not just talking about change for change sake—I am talking about change for sake of the growth of God’s kingdom. I believe that the Great Commission Resurgence is about change for the sake of the kingdom. I am ecstatic to see change occurring at every level of our denominational organization.
I am thrilled to see the change that is happening in my local association. We recently voted to put our associational building up for sale. The proceeds from the sale of the building will be put in our state’s foundation with the interest being used to fund church planting or any other worthy cause that the association may agree upon. I am thrilled that we are turning bricks and mortar into flesh and blood. The Kingdom of God does not grow through buildings but through people. I am glad that in the Longs Peak Association we are trading our building for people. Budget shortfalls have required that our association become lean and mean. Maybe “have to” is the only way that we will ever change. Our association has adopted a motto, “Putting Churches First”. I really like that—because as Dr. Johnny Hunt says, “The church is king”! Every dollar that the association spends needs to be spent in a way that exceeds what an individual church could do on their own to advance the kingdom. Dollars are scarce in these days and each one must be spent to its maximum potential. I have an elderly lady in my church that lost her husband to death last year. She lives off of her social security and the few extra dollars that people in our church contribute to her. Yet, she faithfully gives to the work of the kingdom. I have seen her take money that people have given to her and turn around and put it right back in the offering. I cannot buy anything on behalf of the church without thinking about Miss Lola and wondering whether or not we’re getting the most bang for her buck. I am pleased that our association seems to be focused as well on getting the biggest bang for Miss Lola’s sacrificially-given offerings. The Great Commission Resurgence appears to already be well underway in my association.
I am thrilled to see the change that is happening in my state convention. Just yesterday, I was included in a conversation intended to recruit a cross-section of Colorado Baptists to participate in a new task force. This group of people will envision why our state convention needs to exist and then starting with a blank sheet of paper begin to strategically identify the essential staff and organization needed to resource our churches in penetrating lostness in Colorado. One of the persons that was asked to participate responded affirmatively with some excellent thoughts. This person wrote in their email, “I have for a long time believed that the Southern Baptist Convention has become too ‘bureaucratically bloated.’ It feels much like our government! My heart, and I believe our churches heart, is for our dollars to reach the mission field. Too much is being spent on either dead or ineffective programs, unneeded staff positions, and out dated agencies! We need to trim the fat! While I believe that Colorado is different from many southern states, I still feel that we need to ‘start with a clean white board.’ My expectation would be that we can actually do that and not give lip service to this. We need to re-evaluate everything! We need to ask the question, “Is it absolutely necessary to the mission?” Less than two years ago, we went through a similar process of reevaluating our Executive Board structure at the state convention. The result was a leaner and meaner body that actually accomplishes some worthwhile things. It appears to me that the Great Commission Resurgence is already well underway in my state convention.
I am thrilled to see the change that is happening in the Southern Baptist Convention. I know that it is early and that there is much that remains unknown. I am excited though that there appears to be great discontent with business as usual. The SBC has a nearly two hundred and six million dollar budget not including Annie and Lottie. I want to see as much of that budget as possible turned into people on the ground preaching Jesus and growing the kingdom. Administration is of course necessary at some level. I’m just wondering if we really need to spend $250,000 for the Executive Committee meetings. We spend $980,475 for “convention relations” and an additional $822,575 for “Convention News”. Now I will confess that I am not at all familiar with these budget items or the fruit that they produce. I am confident that we need public relations, news, and meetings. I just hope that we’re not spending too many of Miss Lola’s dollars on these types of things. I can assure you that she wants each dollar to advance the kingdom of God. It’s really good to see that our SBC leadership has identified the need for a Great Commission Resurgence. I hope to be a part of whatever positive change needs to occur. I am thrilled with the prospects of seeing a lean and mean kingdom-building machine resourcing the great churches across our nation as we seek to saturate lostness around the world. It appears to me that the Great Commission Resurgence is already well underway!



Dave:
There has been a ton of waste at the SBC wide agencies. Especially the NAMB. But I think a new day is dawning.
The IMB has already taken steps to cut back on the frequency of BoT meetings which involve travel for about 100 people to various venues multiple times a year. I think the next shoe to fall with the IMB will likely be trimming the number of people on the BoT. There is no way you can possibly justify having between 80 and a hundred people on the BoT of the IMB. What is the is the “value added” for that 65th person or that 84th person? What are they doing? What board commttee are they on that they are contributing to? What policy decision are all of these people shaping? What oversight are all of these people providing? I say a good start would be to cut the BoT in half.
I’d say the IMB has been “adrift” in recent decades to some extent due to the helter-skelter adjustments to the “mission policy de jour”. Thankfully, most of the stuff is behind us.
The things you are doing in Colorado are good examples of “bottom up” activities that are happening at the associational and state levels. I’m confident that we are going to also see a ramping up of similar streamlining at the agencies at the top — most notably the NAMB and the IMB. I don’t know enough about the seminaries to comment.
Roger Simpson OKC
I guess I still don’t really know what a GCR is.
Could someone ‘splain it to me?
Dave,
Great post! Being a Colorado Southern Baptist (BTW – Colorado and Southern are contradictory terms), I am very much encouraged to hear that a lot of time, effort, and thought are going into making our associations and ultimately our denomination more efficient.
Miss Lola should be very proud that you are advocating that her dollars go where her heart expects them to go when she places them in the offering plate.
Blessings,
Amy
Geoff:
GCR stand for “Great Comission Resurgence”. I don’t know exactly what the original genesis of the term is but it was elucidated in a chapel address in April by Dr. Danny Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Seminary. The address was a result of Dr. Akin’s work based upon input and collaberation with Dr. Mohler and Johnny Hunt (maybe others).
Dr. Hunt took the original 12 points in the GCR as elucidated by Dr. Akin and came out with a 10 point document that he also calls the GCR.
For a complete rundown on what’s happining with this see:
http://greatcomissionresurgence.com
Go to the “media” section to read hear a podcast of Dr. Akin’s chapel sermon. Also there are several podcasts in there of Dr. Hunt being interviewed regarding the GCR and addressing questions regarding the GCR document that people are raising. I like what Dr. Hunt is doing (independent of whether I agree with him on every chapter and verse — which in my case I do) because he is open and above board, he is reaching out to all via the internet to be inclusive, and he is making abjustment to accomodate imput from others. For example, there is “substantial” pushback from state execs. Johnny is scheduling a meeting with the execs and trying to work with them to reach agreement.
The lightening rod of the GCR document is the article which originally stated that the SBC had “bloated bureaucracy” (this is a direct quote from Dr. Akins message). That term has been softened. The section regarding re-org of the SBC, has been wordsmithed at least three times to make it more pallatable — especially to the state execs. I think there is at least one more re-write in the works prior to Louisville which we may see in a week or so after the meeting with state execs at the end of next week.
Also look the “Between The Times” website which is maintained by SEBTS.
Roger
Our Exec, Jimmy Barrentine, has been here six or seven years, and he has spent all that time paring the bureaucracy here. Iowa is already pretty much a bare-bones Baptist organization.
I hope that spirit spreads.
Good question Geoff. My take on it that the title “GCR” (Great Commission Resurgence) describes a renewal, a revitalization of attention and priority to the Great Commission of Matthew 28:18-20.
Dr Akin, of course, has written a document that he believes (and I have signed) expresses the commitments needed in order for a GCR to take place. Dr. Akin’s document is located at http://www.greatcommissionresurgence.com/ and now contains 2929 signatures.
The 10 Axioms that Dr. Akin has proposed are:
I. A Commmitment to Christ’s Lordship.
II. A Commitment to Gospel-Centerdness.
III. A Commitment to the Great Commandments.
IV. A Commitment to Biblical Inerrancy and Sufficiency.
V. A Commitment to a Healthy Confessional Center.
VI. A Commitment to Biblically Healthy Churches.
VII. A Commitment to Sound Biblical Teaching.
VIII. A Commitment to Methodological Diversity that is Biblically Informed.
IX. A Commitment to a More Effective Convention Structure.
X. A Commitment to Distinctively Christian Families.
My post today attempts to point out that Axiom IX is already happening in at least my association and in my state convention. I suspect that we are not alone. It is true that the commitment to more efective convention structures is just one of the ten. Nevertheless it is the one that seems to be getting the most attention at this point.
In my view, the ultimate purpose of a GCR would be kingdom growth through the saving of souls. Dr. Akin says in his preamble, “We are thankful for the Conservative Resurgence and believe that God has also called Southern Baptists to a Great Commission Resurgence as the next step in the fulfillment of our mandate in missions and evangelism which will result in the renewal of our Convention.”
Roger,
In the CBGC, we pared our forty-something member executive board down to sixteen and in my opinion our effectiveness and accountability have gone way up. We eliminated the standing committees on which each board member served and now the entire board considers the entire work of the convention. We also eliminated a board meeting and now only meet, I believe, three times a year. It may not seem like much but I think we were spending something like $16,000 a year on board meetings. The savings is now available for investment in ministry, church planting, etc.
Amy,
There are some negatives that come from the desire to spend as little as possible on administration. The CBGC EB always enjoyed a wonderful catered BBQ meal during our meeting. The last time we met, the catered meal had been replaced with a much less expensive “home-made” meal. Perhaps next time we will be down to “Easy Mac”…
Thanks for commenting…
Dave Miller,
AMEN! I wonder how many other state conventions and associations are streamlining. I have suggested to our area missionary that it would be fun if at the end of our association’s year we could rebate excess funds back to the church’s from which they came. What a concept: we give back what we don’t need.
Isn’t it article IX that’s causing a big stir? I heard that the president of Southwestern didn’t want to sign it, as well as some other big-wigs. What’s the division over exactly?
Brother Geoff,
I think the code “GCR” is a nice and less offensive way of saying what the Apostle Peter said to the folks loving their money….
Act 8:22 “Therefore repent of this wickedness of yours, and pray the Lord that, if possible, the intention of your heart may be forgiven you.
Selling buildings, reducing debt, and the like… can be indicators of repentance, unless of course these leaders of organizations are selling the stuff in order to keep their incomes stable. Time will tell.
The Lord brings about the harvest,…so I am not so concerned that He will fail in that endeavor. The church needs more committed to be harvesters and not grazers… Less buildings and debt for the right reasons can lead to a well defined meaing of stewardship.
Blessings,
Chris
Article VII – “Commitment to Sound Biblical Teaching” is where I believe the local church has to begin a focused preparation. We have been given the “placebo” word from the material we use for such a long time. Teachers are not grounded in the word and, from what I have seen, have been raised on the LifeWay material all their life (I’m talking about adults). We have generations of people who have been given the LifeWay material to teach and told to “teach it the way you want to”. From the teachers and the material that we should use, a true Christian should have the opportunity to be as equipped as any pastor within their local church. However, there is such a “gulf” between the church member and the pulpit that it isn’t even funny. This isn’t Catholicism. God expects every believer to be as equipped, if not more, than the pastor in the truths of scripture. Please understand that I understand the calling, however, if a person wants more, sometimes, they have to find it somewhere else. Maybe more pastor’s need to step up to the plate and duplicate themselves in the people they shepherd. What could a church do if the majority of the people were as equipped and grounded as their pastor? Certainly, we would be better equipped to face this GCR.
Andrew,
I’m not sure exactly except to say that we all need to be careful about what we endorse. I trust that individuals will sign or not sign based on their understanding of the document. IX causes fear, I think, because it’s not specifically defined. Dr. Hunt intends to appoint a task force in Louisville that will study and then make recommendations. I believe that Dr. Hammmond is doing the same thing in regards to NAMB organization and structures. SBC Today is reporting that Dr. Jerry Vines has signed with caveats. You can read about it here: http://sbctoday.com/2009/05/28/gcr-dr-vines-signs-with-caveats/. Dr. Bart Barber has listed his reasons for not signing here: http://praisegodbarebones.blogspot.com/2009/05/namb-imb-and-gcr.html.
Dr. Johnny Hunt has a brief video online at the GCR website: http://www.greatcommissionresurgence.com/
Morris Chapman weighs in through Baptist Press here: http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=30585