Answering Questions – Part 2
Posted by From the Middle East in Church & Missions
The first “common question from Muslims” we considered was, “Why would God allow one of the most honored prophets (Jesus) to be defeated (on the cross) by unbelievers?” Today, we will consider the question:
If God is truly just, how can one person suffer for anotherʼs sin?
Let’s be honest. This concept is offensive. It sounds like nonsense. Why? Because it does not seem just or right. The just for the unjust? How can it be? Doesn’t Ezekiel even tell us that “the soul who sins shall die?” That sons will not be punished for the sins of their fathers nor fathers for the sins of their sons? Yes. And this is true justice, that each suffer for his own misdeeds. So, in one sense, this aspect of Jesus’ work would seem to appear as if it is strange or weird or just plain unacceptable.
But on the other hand, those who say such things have not typically considered who Jesus is. The assumption is that he is just like us, a regular guy. If that is the case I do have quite an issue with the concept of the Creator of the Heavens and Earth meting out my due penalty upon this other guy that did not earn it. So, is he just some regular guy that supposedly suffered for someone’s sin? I would argue that his characteristics demonstrate that he is so much more! Sinless, pure, miraculous in every way, totally obedient to God, full of true self-sacrificial love for humanity. Wow! Maybe it was not just some person suffering for another’s sin…
Cultural Issues:
While the concept of one being taking on another’s burden is not easy to swallow and is certainly foolishness to those who are perishing, I firmly believe that the self-sacrificial nature of this concept is compelling to many. But how do we effectively communicate this concept to Muslims? As always, when communicating with folks from other cultures, one of the issues we must deal with is that of worldview. All worldviews have a major emphasis with regards to how they “feel” or “perceive” the effects of sin. For us, here in the West, it is primarily that we “feel” guilty. And we should, because we are. This is the basis for our strong sense of justice and strong cultural conviction that no one is “above the law.” It can be argued that this sense of guilt is due to the western worldview’s strong ties to the Roman Empire. Regardless, we certainly have a strong sense of guilt and greatly desire our punishment to be declared “paid in full.”
Easterns, on the other hand, primarily feel the effects of sin as “shame” rather than guilt and greatly desire this shame to be removed from them and their honor to be restored. While there is not space in this venue to go into depth on this topic, Roland Muller’s “Honor and Shame” is an excellent, short read on the topic.
The difficulty we, as westerners, have in communicating with easterners is in articulating how honor is restored rather than guilt removed. Since we do not typically communicate in this category, I will use an example here that most here will be familiar with via recent news stories.
Honor Killings:
Honor killings, while completely un-Islamic, do occur primarily in the East. Typically they occur because of a perceived loss of family honor due to a shameful act by one of the family members. I cannot emphasize enough that justice (deserved penalty for an offense) is not what drives honor killings. It is honor. Easterners have a very strong sense of personal and family honor. When it is offended or challenged, they are deeply disturbed not only for their own personal honor, but also for their family honor. Something must be done in order to either retain or regain their honor. The first option is often to cover up the cause? However if this shameful deed was done in public and it is not possible to cover it up, something must be done to remove the shame and restore honor!
How is honor restored? By shedding blood. There is a very common Arabic proverb that states, “There is no cleansing of shame except by blood” (compare with Hebrews 9:22). This cleansing of shame and restoration of honor is typically accomplished by shedding the blood of the one who brought the shame. Further, it is typically carried out by the eldest male (other than the father).
Now, what corresponds to this in our worldview? We believe that guilt must be punished and that the Messiah suffered the punishment for our sin on our behalf. We often illustrate this by a story of an offender being judged as guilty and then the judge (or another messiah figure) steps in to pay the penalty thereby vindicating the offender. This is “substitutionary atonement.” But how do we communicate this concept in the realm of honor and shame?
One path to effective communication I have found helpful when visiting about this concept within the honor and shame paradigm is to present the cross as a substitutionary honor killing rather than a substitutionary atonement. In other words, someone must die to cleanse our shame and restore our honor. And while it should be the one who brought the shame, God loves us enough to send One, greater than us, who has no shame whatsoever to die in our place.
Again, this concept does not necessarily connect with a strictly Islamic worldview (though it can with the introduction of more complex concepts from the Generous Qur’an). However, there is no one who is solely influenced by a particular religious system. A worldview is influenced by multiple factors and this aspect of Jesus’ work on the cross does connect with those coming from an eastern perspective.
So, Jesus not only suffered to take away humanity’s guilt, but also to restore honor to humanity. And while we come from a primarily guilt-driven culture, many from the West still have a deep sense of shame due to past experiences and choices they have made. Do you feel a deep sense of shame in your life because of things you have done in the past? I would like to encourage you to embrace what the Messiah has done for you and ask God to release you from this shame. You are promised that Jesus has taken your shame upon himself (Philippians 2:6-8 & Hebrews 12:2) and that if you look to him you will be “radiant” and your face will never be “covered with shame” (Psalm 34:5).
Let the discussion begin…



Brother FTME,
I think you are correct in how Muslim’s understand a reason for death in this instance. It does stem from the honor system and is foreign to the minds of westerners for the most part. I have a good friend, Naveed, a Muslim man and we have lunch and work together on occasion. He has this same question, and I have found that his concept of the nature of sin is not as the bible describes. So, his belief that all are created “good” and that his choices determine his ultimately destiny run contrary to scripture as well.
In our last conversation, we talked a lot about why Jesus had to die. His understanding (tradition) of restoring honor is a big impediment to understanding the reality of creation and the fall of man.
These conversations take time and patience. I love Naveed, and I pray that God shows him mercy as He has shown me mercy. The best I can do is to continue to speak the gospel of God so that as he begins to understand and see his sin…the gospel will be clear and comforting to him.
When you say “restoring honor”,….. this is certainly the goal for the Muslim. But, do you think the Muslim is using Christ to restore “his” honor, or do you find the Muslim understanding that there is really no “good” (honor) to be restored, only sin to be taken away and righteousness to be imputed?
Blessings,
Chris
Very nice. I would also say that the story of Abraham and his son illustartes the point very well: God tested Abrham. But even after he proved his obedience he had to provide a sacrifice, a dhibh 3adhiim (we talked about this actually).
Brother Chris,
It is exciting that you visit often with your Muslim friend. I will pray with you for God to show him mercy!
You asked:
When you say “restoring honor”,….. this is certainly the goal for the Muslim. But, do you think the Muslim is using Christ to restore “his” honor, or do you find the Muslim understanding that there is really no “good” (honor) to be restored, only sin to be taken away and righteousness to be imputed?
I am not sure that I completely understand the question, but will take a shot anyway. Please clarify if I have misunderstood the question. Here goes:
1. No, Muslims do not trust the Messiah to restore their honor before God. This is the reason presenting Jesus as a sacrificial honor killing, rather than a sacrificial atonement, is a good idea.
2. When we talk about honor being restored, it is important to remember that shame came upon us (and honor was lost) as a result of sin. So, we may very well share the Good News with someone by speaking of sin being taken away and then someone being declared righteous. Another facet of the Good News that may be beneficial to focus on with a Muslim is that Jesus has taken away sin and that the shame that is a RESULT of sin has also been removed and he has restored our honor. Again, guilt and shame are FELT EFFECTS of sin. Sin must be addressed in order for these effects to be taken care of.
3. Muslims do not believe that sin is imputed to all of humanity as a result of Adam’s failure. However, they do believe we have all chosen to sin. This concept has been enough, in my experience, to bring them to an understanding of their personal shame (brought upon them by sin).
4. As part of your equipment to proclaim the Kingdom of God to Naveed (and other Muslims) through your conversations, I would strongly encourage you to pick up a copy of the book referenced in this post, Honor and Shame. It will give you greater insight into his worldview and how the Good News is truly good news for him!
Again, if I did not answer your question, please let me know. I should be near a computer for the remainder of the day.
His peace be yours in abundance,
From the Middle East
Brother Chris,
Two more quick items:
You said:
His understanding (tradition) of restoring honor is a big impediment to understanding the reality of creation and the fall of man.
What do you mean by this? In what was is his concept of restoring honor impeding his understanding of what the Messiah has done for him?
You said:
These conversations take time and patience.
Amen. Most Muslims who come to understand who the Messiah is and embrace God’s Kingdom interact multiple times with God’s people and with the Bible extensively prior to committing. But there is great rejoicing when they do! Hang in there brother!!
His mercy be yours in abundance,
From the Middle East
Brother FTME,
Thanks for the helpful information. I have many friends in the Muslim society in Nashville, TN and Naveed is one of those. Your experience and insight does help me as I am able to share the gospel with these men and women.
I’ll pick up a copy of the book as well.
Thanks and Blessings,
Chris