The Second Commandment: The Basis of Worship
Posted by Rob Ayers in Bible & Theology
One of my favorite resources (as I have shared before here) on the Ten Commandments is the work by Alistaire Begg entitled Pathway to Freedom: How God’s Laws Guide Our Lives (Chicago: Moody Publishers, 2003). I preached a series of sermons based upon the outlines provided by Pastor Begg (having gained his written blessing so I would not be in violation of the Eighth Commandment). Lately we have discussed here on IMPACT! several issues concerning worship. I believe that a review of the Second Commandment is an important issue that should be considered in true worship (I also need time to complete my thoughts about church and state). Several themes and also some common words flow from Pastor Beggs thoughts in the following offering:
You shall not make for yourself a carved image – any
Likeness of anything that is in heaven above,
Or earth beneath,
Or that is in the water under the earth;
You shall not bow down to them or serve them.
For I, the Lord your God am a jealous God,
Visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children
To the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me,
But showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me
And keep my commandments.
Exodus 20: 4-5
Thrown out from the Garden of Eden, our first parents Adam and Eve settled down, worked the earth, and began the first human family. The first son born to Eve she named “Cain” for he was the one she pined her hopes in overthrowing the scourge of the fall. “I have acquired a man from the Lord,” she said, the one for whom she prayed would “crush the serpent with his heel.” The second son born was named “Abel,” who was “the breath of life, a beautiful child” to his proud parents. Cain was a tiller of the soil, while Abel his brother was a herder of cattle and sheep.
God called upon each of the boys in turn to acknowledge Him as the One true God through the giving of a sacrifice. Cain brought an offering of his surplus, “the fruit of the ground” to the Lord. Abel for his part brought a first-born lamb, the best of his flock, to the Lord as an offering. The Lord accepted the offering of Abel. A sacrifice of blood from an innocent is what God had previously revealed to his parents would be an acceptable sacrifice, and thus would honor and glorify God. Cain’s offering, the fruit of Cain’s own hand and work was unacceptable, for it would merely affirm humanities desire to be self-reliant and self-righteous, and was thereby rejected by God. Let us not think that Cain was unaware of God’s demand of a sinless and humble sacrifice – Cain’s lack of humility in giving the gift of his own making was part of the rebellion that the “sacrifice” represented that God rejected. Because of his anger with God over the rejection of his offering, Cain slew his brother Abel in retaliation against God. Cain therefore became the first murderer in human history. What his parents had hoped from his life was dashed to pieces in that one instant when Cain, in an act of rebellion, refused to worship God in a way that God demanded, but preferred to worship a God of his own making instead.
The worship of God is foremost dependent upon in what manner God has revealed Himself to us. The absence of the many symbols of God in most Baptist sanctuaries is not because of neglect, but by design. The lack of a material altar is one example. The absence of an actual altar at the front, or a kneeling pad in the pews is primarily because our Baptist ancestors held that Christ’s one and only sacrifice of Himself is the only altar necessary in a New Testament church.
In fact, the general lack of “symbol overload” in most Baptist churches is a result of what historically Baptists have believed: we who are worshipers of God should not be visually distracted by artistic interpretations of mere humans in seeking that which should be worshiped “in spirit and in truth.” The only three symbols universally held to by most Baptist churches in the sanctuary is the following: the Lord’s Table; that which the Lord lays out in an invitation for all to come to Him and break bread for thus as it is written; “Come, Let us reason together, says the Lord”: the Bible on the Table; it is the “bread”; the “meat”, God’s Word, which shows humanity the futility of self-righteousness, of what sin is, and points humanity to the witness of the Savior who is the only one who can save humanity from the debt of sin; and the Pulpit from which God’s living Word is preached so that all men will be drawn to hear the Word of Life, and to drink heavily the Living Water. The heavy use of items such as paintings, statues, artifacts, banners, and other symbolic artifacts that are often displayed in the liturgical church have historically been avoided in Baptist circles because of our belief that God alone is to be worshiped without the use of visual aids of and about the LORD, thus being in obedience to the second commandment.
The first commandment, “There shall be no other gods before Me” arises on account of who God is and what He has done, in that He is both Creator and Redeemer. We can proceed to ask, “How should I be a totally devoted person so as to keep the first commandment?” The first commandment forbids the worship of any false god, and the second demands that we do not worship the true God in an unworthy manner. We must worship the correct God correctly!
Moses reminds the Israelites in Deuteronomy the following:
“Take careful heed to yourselves, for you saw no form
When the Lord spoke to you at Horeb out of the midst of the fire,
Lest you act corruptly and make for yourselves a carved image
In the form of any figure: the likeness of male or female,
The likeness of any animal that is on the earth
Or the likeness of any fish that is in the water beneath the earth.
And take heed, lest you lift your eyes to heaven,
And when you see the sun, the moon, and the stars,
All the hosts of heaven, you feel driven to worship them and serve them,
Which the Lord your God has given to all the peoples
Under the whole of heaven as a heritage.
But the Lord has taken you out of the iron furnace,
Out of Egypt, to be His people, an inheritance
As you are this day.
Deuteronomy 4: 15-21
Why this prohibition? As John Calvin noted in his commentary on the Torah, specifically on the second commandment:
“Whatever forms of God man devises are diametrically opposed to His nature; therefore, as soon as idols appear, true religion is corrupted and adulterated.”
As most of the reformers noted during the Protestant Reformation, when the church was strong and doctrine was pure, the church rejected images. When the gospel is no longer preached as strongly as it had been in the first church, then the incidence of superstitious rituals increases. Instead of relying on the holy protection of God, and steadfastly entering the throne room of grace for Holy Communion and Divine protection, there are many who merely place pictures of Christ, statues or pictures of the saints, angels, or various other religious artifacts as devices of protection. These are used as talisman (good luck charms) in hopes that the artifacts themselves can protect both the “believer” and their families from harm. Instead of lovingly and courageously preaching Christ as the crucified and risen one in both word and deed to friends and family, today’s Christians believe that having a bumper sticker or a religious symbol on a car, in their homes, or even carrying a cross on one’s neck need be the only witness they muster in sharing their personal faith to a dying world. Martin Luther, the father and “engine” of the Protestant Reformation, who as part of his rebellion against Rome railed against the deification of religious artifacts, would now be aghast at the movement that he began.
To whom, then, will you compare God?
What image will you compare Him to?
Isaiah 40:18
Since all things are created by God and are subject to Him, it makes no sense at all to think of fashioning anything that could ever represent the Creator of the Universe. Our imagination, even though itself is a wonderful gift, when it is used to conjure up an image of God could very well lead us astray. The problem with all of this is that God is defined by His revelation of Himself from His Word, and when we conceive of Him apart from that, the image will be misleading at best.
Take for example this story told to us from the Torah:
Now when the people saw that Moses was delayed coming down from
The mountain, the people gathered together to Aaron, and said to him,
“Come, make us gods that shall go before us;
for as for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt,
we do not know what has become of him.”
Exodus 32: 1
It is at this point that Aaron can be the hero – he can admonish them for their impatience, unbelief, and disobedience and send them on their way. Yet, he tells them to go ahead and give him their gold so that he can make an idol (2).
And he received the gold from their hand, and he fashioned it with
An engraving tool, and made a molded calf.
Then they said, “This is your god, O Israel, that brought you out of the land of Egypt!”
So when Aaron saw it, he built an altar before it.
And Aaron made a proclamation and said,
“Tomorrow is a feast to the LORD.”
Exodus 32: 4-5
Upon hearing the proclamation of the people that the calf was the god who brought them out of Egypt, we might expect that Aaron would come to his senses, melt the whole thing down after realizing he had made a terrible mistake. On the contrary, he builds an altar and calls the next day a feast day before Yahweh! At the minimum, he was naïve. Did Aaron truly believe that a solid gold calf would remind the people of the One and only True God of Israel? The gold calf displayed nothing of the greatness of God or His glory, and did everything else to distort it. When humanity gets worship wrong, chaos ensues. Paul describes it this way:
Because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him
As God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts,
And their foolish hearts were darkened.
Professing to be wise, they became fools,
And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image
Of corruptible man – and birds and four-footed animals, and creeping things.
Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts
Of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves.
Who exchanged the truth of God for the lie,
And worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator,
Who is blessed forever, Amen.
For this reason, God gave them over to vile passions. For even
The women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.
Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
Men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
Romans 1:21-27
In summary: to exchange the truth of God is a lie; to exchange the image of God into the image of mortal man and birds and reptiles leads to corruption; God then makes humanity susceptible to the sinful desires of the human heart, which springs forth into adultery, homosexuality, and every kind of wickedness. It was at the sight and sounds of sexual debauchery at the foot of the golden calf that Moses descended down the mountain with the Ten Commandments. Moses who had been in the Holy presence of Yahweh God now throws the stone tablets down in disgust with both anger and sadness at a people who had exchanged God’s image with one of their own. No wonder God warns those who break the 2nd Commandment of His anger against the 3rd and 4th generations that hate him.
Do you think that stuff like this does not happen today? Surely people are not changing the image of an incorruptible God for corruptible man? Think again. In November of 1993, two thousand women gathered in Minneapolis for what was the most bizarre and dreadful conference of the final decade of the 20th century. Representatives of all the major mainstream Christian denominations, such as Methodists, Episcopalians, Catholics, and even Baptists were present at the gathering. The conference, which was entitled “Re-imagine”, sought to construct a “new god” and a “new road” to salvation. They rejected the orthodox view of the incarnation and atonement of Jesus Christ as being nothing other than a patriarchal construct, which they blamed for the oppression of women. The attendees blessed, thanked, and praised in very creative and pagan ways the goddess “Sophia” as a deity who they claimed was with God during creation, which was a “re-image” of the Son, Jesus. The whole event is summarized from a quote of one of the attendees who said the following, “If we cannot imagine Jesus as a tree, as a river, and as rain, then we are doomed together.”
The final phrase, of course, is accurate, but not like she suggests. Rather, both they and we are doomed if we reject Him in whom all God’s fullness dwells in bodily form:
And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.
1 John 5:20He is the image of the invisible God, the first born over all creation.
Colossians 1:15



I just discovered that Rob had his comments turned off. I enabled comments and pings. Sorry for the mix-up everyone!
Rob, I’ll have to read and comment later. I’m headed for a couple of hours of torture at the hand of my dentist.
If the Pentateuch really tells us that places of worship should be plain and undecorated, is it not odd that the Lord told Solomon to build such an elaborate Temple in 1 Kings 6 and 7?
Think about it: the temple had cedar rafters, statues of cherubim, golden chains, carved figures of palm trees and flowers, bronze columns, gold lampstands, 400 pomegranates, etc etc. It’s amazing anyone managed to worship there with so many distractions.
Patrick,
The Pentateuch teaches what it teaches – look above. The New Testament (Jesus) taught us that true worshipers would no longer need to go to the Temple in Jerusalem, but that true worship (in both spirit and in truth) did not happen in buildings made by human hands (HT Lew) but in the heart. The Reformers understood that relics did nothing to adhere worshipers to God, only muddled the issue. Did you read carefully what I wrote?
Rob
Rob, I read your post several times and it still confuses me. If this is crystal clear to everyone else, then I apologize for being dense. Please bear with me.
First, you talked about why Baptist churches are sparsely decorated. Now you say true worship takes place in the heart. If that is so, why does it matter how the church is furnished? What part of the New Testament gives any guidance on this, one way or the other?
Second, if I read Exodus and Deuteronomy literally then all statues and images of any person, animal or fish are prohibited. There are people today who take it that far. I presume you don’t. How then do you decide when statues are ok and when they are not? For example, is the Statue of Liberty idolatrous?
Third, I agree the Golden Calf was bad. Yet a few hundred years later the statues in the Temple were good. Now in the New Testament era you say statues are bad again. Whatever the Reformers might say, I have a hard time following the Scriptural basis for this changing requirement. Maybe you can clarify?
It seems to me that it is the worship of an image, not the image itself, that is problematic. If I look at a picture of Billy Graham and feel inspired to imitate his magnificent Christian life, it doesn’t mean I worship him. This seems like a good thing. If an image helps one worship the True God – if looking at a crucifix helps you appreciate the way Christ suffered and died for us – what’s so wrong with it?
Thanks for the clarification.
Rob,
This is a good subject that is enticing me into dialogue with myself…lol. I’m wondering, at what point is a “visual” an aid verses a distraction? For example, I very much enjoy the images that are projected during our corporate worship times with my church. These pictures of mountains and oceans that support the songs that we are singing help me to passionately come before the throne of grace with thanksgiving in my heart. They help me to grasp the awesome possibilities of God. Hmmmm…What about the tendency of Baptist churches in days gone by to paint murals on the back wall of the baptistry? What about the prominant use of the cross as an icon in our worship centers? You mention the the table and the pulpit. Are these not also potential distractions? (BTW we don’t use either in our facility). I sometimes preach with a powerpoint that includes pictures…what about that? Is an image always an idol? Is an idol always an imgage?
–Dave
American flags are very common artifacts in Baptist Churches. (I’d prefer they weren’t)
I’m just sayin’
Good point Bill. I’m not sure what His Glory has to do with old glory. Why don’t we just sing the national anthem before service? And then have a seventh inning stretch if the sermon goes too long?
PatrickW,
You said … “It seems to me that it is the worship of an image, not the image itself, that is problematic.”
I agree. I have always understood and interpreted the commands against graven images as the forbidding of “replacements” for God, false gods, if you will.
We do not use statues or 3-D images in our church. We do, however, use projection and pictures, lighting, and, on occasion, candles. We have found that all serve to enhance our worship experience, not replace our Lord.
There has been some discussion of the pulpit. One time, in a Baptist meeting, I heard a woman share her testimony with the church. She was made to use a music stand off to the side of the pulpit … she was not allowed to speak from behind that man-made wooden structure. Has not that piece of furniture been treated as sacred by many? Could not even the podium from behind which we speak become something of a graven image?
I don’t get the reference to the padded kneelers. I never understood them to be a type of altar, but rather a way of making it a little more comfortable to kneel when praying. We sure like to call the front of the church the altar and get people to walk up and kneel there.
Patrick – what statues in the Temple are you referring? There were the two cherubim which went wall to wall in the Holy of hollies which housed the Ark – etched ornamentation of flowers and angels in the structure itself – the twelve oxen which held up the “sea of bronze” which Hiram the coppersmith made. There were various utensils used – very little ornamentation besides the simplicity of precious metals, chiseled columns, and finely etched figures such as palm trees, flowers, angels, and lions. the only vague representation of “statues” in the temple at all would be the Ark and the figures surrounding it, with the protective shield of cherubim on both sides of an otherwise simple box covered in precious metals. Their were no “statues” found in the temple nor it’s predecessor the Tabernacle precisely because of the Second Commandment. Most orthodox Jewish homes even go so far and refuse to take any pictures of themselves and hang them in their homes because humanity is made “in the image of God.” Many Messianic Jewish believers refuse to hang any renditions of Jesus in their homes that are most common in Christian homes, or if they do, they cover the eyes of Christ so as not to give any “false” image. Now I would not go so far as that, believe me. I do not believe artistic statues made in a person’s image is violating the second commandment (like Lady Liberty). I do believe however that the over emphasis of symbols and “good luck charms” (sorry, I must be direct) could very well distract from the one true message, as well as being patently false. I believe the test is this: does this ________ (statue, object) claim to be in the place of, or in the “image” of a Holy God? The golden calf did; the cherubim, oxen, lions and palm trees did not. Statues of Buddha or other eastern “god” – Yes, very definitely. Lady Liberty? I don’t believe so. Religious artifacts used as talisman? Yes. Identifying symbols such as crosses or even national flags (used as reminders as the nation who stands in account to God in need of prayer) – No.
Rob
Dave,
A “visual” aid becomes distracting when it becomes central as the object of worship rather than a tool towards true worship. Here is the bare truth – we need none of those aids to worship Christ. We don’t need a table, or a pulpit. We do not require a worship band, a choir, or any instruments. We don’t need banners, baptisteries, chairs, air conditioning, projectors, or pictures of any kind to worship Christ. Now that is the bare truth of the matter. If anyone says we do, then are they worshiping the creation over the creator? That is the bare bones reason to be careful and prudent when thinking or implementing any of these things.
Rob
To all -
My reference to Baptist in the past was merely to highlight how they interpreted the Second Commandment, and built in that interpretation in their sanctuaries. Do I think even these simple things such as the Pulpit, and the Table, can be tradition laden to the point of veneration? Yes I do. At the same time I understand both the purpose of the symbols as well as the reason why they are usually the only symbols allowed in most Baptist churches – the “High Church” liturgical tradition as well as the “Contemporary” Worship centers continue to remain the anomalies and rarities in Southern Baptist life.
Rob
I was thinking specifically of the oxen and lions. Statue vs etching doesn’t really matter – both are types of images, no? If Deuteronomy 4 really prohibits graven images of “any animal that is on the Earth,” oxen and lions would seem to qualify.
For that matter, Exodus 20 talks about images of “anything that is in heaven above,” so it ought to rule out the cherubim, too.
Maybe a better example is Numbers 21:8-9, where the Lord ordered Moses to make a bronze serpent that the people could look at to be cured of their snake bites. It seems God actually uses images for good sometimes.
That aside, I do like your final test: does this ________ (statue, object) claim to be in the place of, or in the “image” of a Holy God?
I totally agree. But this leaves me wondering what it is in the liturgical churches you find objectionable. Anglicans, Catholics, Orthodox do not claim that their statues take the place of God. By your definition, then, these are not graven images and there is no second commandment issue.
Maybe a better example is Numbers 21:8-9, where the Lord ordered Moses to make a bronze serpent that the people could look at to be cured of their snake bites. It seems God actually uses images for good sometimes.
That’s an interesting example, as the same bronze serpent was later destroyed, because the Israelites were making it an idol and burning incense to it (see 2 Kings 18:4).
Yes, exactly, Oloryn. The image was permissible and even beneficial as long as used in the manner God intended. The problem was the misuse of the image, not its existence.
Technically, the RC Church makes a distinction between “worshipping” (latria) and “venerating” (dulia) an image. Nonetheless, I have seen people line up to kiss the hand of the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe in Spain (under the supervision of an ordained monk), and others pray to images, and hold all kinds of superstitions related to images. It’s hard for me to believe that what goes on in many, many places around the world today is not equivalent to what the Israelites were doing with the bronze serpent when it was destroyed.
From Brother David in comment #16:
“It’s hard for me to believe that what goes on in many, many places around the world today is not equivalent to what the Israelites were doing with the bronze serpent when it was destroyed.”
Good point. And it seems that Brothers PatrickW and Oloryn nail it when they bring the example of the serpent statue. It is our attitude and allegiance that is key. If we recognize it as a part of creation that God is using and glorify Him because of it, it is not just okay, but good. However, if we begin to worship it (defined as giving our allegiance to it over God), then we have crossed the line.
Now let’s get relevant to American churches… Some (NOT ALL) of our congregations would do well to evaluate whether or not we elevate the following above God:
1. The Cooperative Program.
2. Our own safety.
3. Filling all the empty seats on a committee or deacon board.
4. Filling all the teacher positions at a VBS.
5. The United States of American on July 4 or Veterans Day.
6. The actual building we meet in.
7. The Bible.
8. A particular method of evangelism or discipleship.
9. Programs in our local congregations.
10. A particular “system” of theology.
11. A particular political party or politician.
12. Etc
13. Etc
14. Etc
May our worship be His,
From the Middle East
Rob,
From what I’ve read so far, you have a very interesting post. Unfortunately, I haven’t had the chance to read it entirely, yet. Seems like you’ve got some pretty solid discussions going on here too. I’ve actually read more of the comments than your actual post!
David,
Regarding comment #16… I think the best way to find out is to destroy some of the images. If they freak out, they were probably worshiping them
.
By the way, if someone came over and destroyed my laptop, I’d probably be a little more than upset. I wonder if that is telling of anything?
God’s Glory,
Lew
Lew,
I have seen people freak out in a demonic sort of way (literally) when someone else (not me) destroyed their image. It was a strange, but also enlightening experience.
From The Middle East (#17)…
Ouch, that hurts.
You’re totally right. Idolatry is alive and well in our culture and our churches – with or without images.
David Rogers,
I don’t want to hijack the thread as I take this opportunity to pose a question to you for a possible future post from you.
Why do you think missionaries have more overt dealings with demons than we do here in America? Or do they?
As I said I don’t want to hijack this thread and I’m not looking for an answer here. I just wanted to pose a question for a possible future post from David.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled program…
Les
Les,
I’ll have to think about that. I have a certain reluctance to sensationalizing this type of stuff, but maybe I could come up with something interesting and edifying related to this. We’ll see…