Success As Measured by the New Testament
Posted by Les Puryear in Church & Missions
I’ve been reading a wonderful little book entitled, Small Churches Are Beautiful. It somewhat dated as it was published in 1977, however, many of the principles cited are still valid.
One point the author makes is we must measure success by biblical principles, not worldly principles. Here’s a quote:
“Large churches have been perceived as better and more desirable than small ones, especially small, rural congregations. Large churches can afford to pay their pastors more and are usually more willing to do so. Large churches are likely to have a pool of trained leaders. Large churches are likely to have a significant number of professional people and executives whose life-styles and experiences are closer to those of educated ministers. Many pastors feel more at home with the well-educated than with others. In a society in which influence is based on bigness and money, large-church naturally have more influence and status than their small church colleagues. Large churches have usually been more profitable outlets in terms of mission dollars. In short, the large church approximates society’s definition of success better than the small one.
“In contrast with this popular standard of success is the New Testament concept of the wholeness of the system and the value of each part. Paul stressed this in 1 Cor. 12:12-31, comparing the church to a body in which each part has an essential purpose. The body cannot function as intended if any part is missing or fails to fulfill its purpose. Thus it is foolish for one part of the body to disdain another because it is different or smaller.
“Paul emphasized the necessity of evaluating each part of the body on the basis of the contribution it is designed to make and its fidelity to that purpose. It is not faulted for not fulfilling a function of some other part. It is foolish to condemn the ear because it cannot see or the eye because it cannot hear. The eye is to be judged by how faithfully it fulfills its function of seeing, and the ear on how faithfully it fulfills the function of hearing. As each part functions in its own way, the whole body is built up.
“In a variety of ways, small and large churches are different. Each has its peculiar role to play in the ministry and mission of Christ’s body in the world. Since each is faced with differing challenges and social settings, no church is to be judged on the basis of its resemblance to another. It is to be judged on the fulfillment of its calling in light of its resources and setting. Each church, regardless of size, contributes to the life of the whole body of Christ. Neither the large nor small church needs to be ashamed of itself or judge itself or the other to be inferior.”
I agree with these remarks. Each church in the whole body of Christ in the world is there to exalt Jesus, evangelize the lost, and edify believers in the context of its own culture.



Les,
I’m sure you have written about it somewhere, but I’ve missed it. How do you define “small” church and “large” church? I know your church isn’t a “mega” church, yet it is much larger than the small rural churches in my area. Also, is there ever a time when a church is “too small” to continue a ministry in the community, especially when there’s another SBC church less than 5 miles away?
Is size the issue, or healthiness? If you have 50 or 5000 and everything they do is directed at self-gratification, what’s the difference?
David Wilson
Steve,
You’re right. I have written about those definitions but I am happy to reproduce them here. Please understand that these are my own definitions and there are plenty of people with different points of view.
“Small” – Less than 200 people in Sunday morning worship attendance. This is probably the maximum that a single-staff pastor can handle.
“Medium” – More than 200 and less than 1,000 people in Sunday morning worship attendance.
“Large or mega” – More than 1,000 in Sunday morning worship attendance.
David,
I think the point is that size does matter in how one goes about pastoring a church. There are many articles on my personal blog attesting to this fact. We need to be aware of the differences as we seek to pastor God’s people as effectively as possible.
Les
I guess I flashed on this, Les:
“Since each is faced with differing challenges and social settings, no church is to be judged on the basis of its resemblance to another. It is to be judged on the fulfillment of its calling in light of its resources and setting.”
That’s where my comment came from. No doubt there are differences in how one would pastor different sized churches. But in the end, it’s not the size but the effectiveness at carrying out the mission that will be judged.
That levels the playing field for those of us in smaller churches. Society sees size as the end all be all of how well you are doing. The author of the book you reviewed saw it differently.
Sorry for the slight thread hijack.
David
Les,
So, by your definition, your church isn’t a small church?
With that in mind, I’m curious what drives your passion for the small church so much?
Steve,
No, by my definition, my church is a small church as we average 195 in Sunday morning attendance.
My passion for small churches is a burden I believe that God has laid on my heart. My first church was a church of 50 people. I was pastor, music director, janitor, sound technician, etc. I did everything. When I went to pastor’s conferences I heard big church pastors teaching big church principles. When I tried to implement those principles in my small church I usually failed. I was trying to be a big church pastor in a small church. Experience has taught me that won’t work. One has to understand small church culture as it is very different from large church culture.
Unfortunately, as I look at our convention today, I see no help on the horizon for leaders of small churches. Most of the materials purchased from Lifeway is from large churches (or so I’m told) and thus, they need to address the needs of their market. Meanwhile, 83% of our churches have less than 200 in Sunday worship attendance and we have no material specifically for our church environment. I would like to see that change.
I also saw how many pastors used small churches as stepping stones to climb the corporate church ladder to larger churches. I believe small churches are beautiful in and of themselves. That’s why I wrote the series “The Beauty of the Small Church” on my personal blog.
It seems that my lot in SBC life is going to be as a small church advocate. I enthusiastically embrace this role and will seek to do all I can to help leaders of small churches lead more effectively.
Have a great 4th.
Les