God, Allah and Good News for Muslims
Posted by Guest Author in Church & Missions
This article begins with two considerations already resolved from my point of view. The first is whether or not we are to “water down” the Good News, that is, the Story of Jesus. We all agree this should not be done. We are a people of conviction and truth and should never shrink from the Story. Rather, we should strive to make it plain, clear and understood.
The second is whether or not the Arabic word commonly transliterated “Allah” is acceptable when referring to the Creator God revealed in the Bible. It is acceptable. This assertion is based upon the following:
✦The word was in use by Christians prior to the advent of Islam.
✦Arabic-speaking Christian Background Believers (CBB) and Muslim Background Believers (MBB) today use this term when referring to God.
✦All Arabic translations of the Bible, or at least the four I am familiar with, use this term in reference to God.
✦If this term is not acceptable, we must cease using the term “God” when speaking with Mormons and “Jehovah” when in the presence of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
What this article is about is whether or not the god of Islam is indeed the same being as the God of the Bible. In order to answer this question, we must first address the question of the nature or characteristics of this being. Hopefully we can all agree that some of the characteristics are the same (holiness, creative ability, transcendence, etc) and some are different (triune nature, knowability, etc). So, we do agree with Muslims that there is a holy, transcendent creator. However, we do not agree on all of His characteristics. What this article addresses is whether or not both Muslims and Christians believe in the same holy, transcendent creator or are our differences so significant that we must insist he is an entirely different being.
Why is this important? In terms of missiology, an understanding of how our “target people group” understands God(s) is essential. Therefore this is where we will begin. We must first understand where the “religion” aspect of our target people group’s worldview is coming from in order to adequately address it as we proclaim Jesus as Lord. Foundational to this is an understanding of who they worship or who they attempt to worship. Do they worship idols? Do they have a sense of one god that is above all things? Do they worship ancestors? Although I do not enjoy putting anyone or anything in a box, creating a few categories should help us get our minds around this particular concept. Here are the categories of belief I propose:
1. Those who worship the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth in truth. The only people who fit in this category are those who find their life solely in Jesus, God’s Messiah. They worship the Creator and Him alone. They accept/receive God’s vindication based upon Jesus’ sacrifice and value Jesus as infinitely more valuable than all else. Thus their worship is acceptable to the Creator
2. Those who worship the creation rather than the Creator. This includes such groups as animists, pantheists, atheists, polytheists, secular humanists, etc. Their devotion is to the creation and thus misplaced.
3. Those who attempt to worship the Creator but their worship is not acceptable to Him because Jesus is not their Mediator. Ultimately if they do reject Jesus, they also reject the Creator and re-create Him as something they desire, thus refusing to be satisfied in what their Creator has provided. Included in this group are Jews and, I would argue, Muslims. Their devotion is to a false understanding of the Creator and thus also misplaced.
Where do Muslims fit in? They certainly do not fit into the first category as they do not know Jesus as Mediator and King. They also fall short of category two in that they do not worship the creation. Rather they believe in a creator that is exalted, set apart, independent of his creation and worthy of all praise. My contention would be that they attempt to worship the Creator of the heavens and earth, but He rejects their worship based upon their rejection of His Messiah.
Do Muslims reject some of the Bible’s teachings concerning the nature of the Creator? Yes. If they did not, they would be Christians. Since they reject some of the characteristics of the Creator, they have a warped understanding of the Creator. But is He still the same being? Are we still referring to the same Creator?
An illustration may help in clearing this up. Let’s imagine there is a person in Denver with bright purple skin. And let’s say he was the only person on the planet with bright purple skin. One day you meet a stranger at Starbuck’s in Omaha and you begin to “get to know each other.” This man tells you that he once visited Denver. You tell him that you actually lived there for ten years. He then begins to tell you of this really mean man who is never nice to anyone. You ask what his name is and he says, “Bill, but the thing about him is that he has bright purple skin.” Your mouth drops in amazement because you happen to be close friends with the purple-skinned man named Bill, but know him to be kind, gentle and loving. So, you ask how he knows this Bill is so bad. He says he once saw him in the street and it looked like he was yelling at a little girl. Knowing Bill’s true character, you begin explaining how it must have been a misunderstanding. You share of how you personally know this man and have been close with him for many years. Yet your new acquaintance rejects this idea of Bill and holds to his conviction that he is mean.
✦Are you both referring to the same person?
Of course you are – he is the only person in the world with bright purple skin. The other guy is simply not as well-acquainted with Bill.
✦Does his slander of Bill change Bill’s character?
Of course not. While his untrue words can cause greater misunderstandings, Bill has not ceased to be Bill and we are still talking about the same person.
✦Do you address these misunderstandings?
Of course, but it would be a mistake to say, “Oh, we must be talking about a different Bill with bright purple skin.” Rather, you would say, “I think you are missing something here. That’s not how Bill is at all. What you saw must have been a misunderstanding. I personally know Bill and he is kind, gentle and loving.”
In the same way, Muslims are referring to the same Creator as the Creator in the Bible even though they misunderstand his nature in some ways.
But where do we draw the line? What if someone believes in a supreme creator, but this creator is not all-knowing? Would we still be referring to the same creator? That is really the issue we are dealing with here. Are Muslims in error? Yes. Can we say we both worship the Creator of the heavens and earth in truth? No. Are our concepts of the Creator the same? No. So, what we must determine is what are the “minimums” someone must believe about their god for us to be referring to the same being. In other words, “What is the lowest common denominator?”
My contention is that anyone who believes in a being who is self-existent, created all things, is infinitely higher than all things and is the only being worthy of worship is referring to the same Creator of the Bible. While their worship may not be acceptable to the Creator, we are referring to the same being even if there are other fundamental differences.
How do Muslims measure up to this lowest common denominator? They believe in one Creator who is worthy of all praise and glory. This Creator is holy, self-existent, above all and yet speaks to humanity through prophets. Some of those He has spoken through are Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, John the Baptist, Jesus and Muhammad. It would seem Muslims are attempting to worship the very Creator we know so well.
The evangelistic implications of this are simple yet essential if we desire to effectively communicate the Good News to Muslims. While we do acknowledge that the Creator referred to in the Qur’an is the same Creator referred to in the Bible, we must make it clear that there is no way to this Creator except through His Messiah, namely Jesus of Nazareth. To imply anything else to a Muslim is to give him false hope. Not only this, but we should clearly communicate that he must accept Jesus for who He says He is and not who he has been taught He is. While I am loathe to use anecdotal evidence, the MBBs I know and know of typically do not say they have found the true God. Rather, they rejoice since they have found the acceptable Path to Allah and now have a real relationship with Him.
Now comes the discussion. While I have interacted with this question on multiple occasions (with individuals, in group settings and in the blogosphere), this is the first time I have written an article outlining my position on the matter. And it strikes me that it is much easier to answer questions than to monologue and make my thoughts understood. This means that I may not be clear on some points here and therefore encourage questions and comments. During the discussion I do ask a few things of you:
1. If you disagree with my categories, please provide alternate categories.
2. If you disagree with my requirements for the lowest common denominator, please share what you believe the requirements should be.
3. Please leave The Camel Training Manual out of this conversation. In an upcoming post I will be reviewing this book and we can discuss its methodology then.
May the Creator’s grace, mercy and peace be ours during this discussion,
From the Middle East



FTME,
What about a category #4?
Those who believe in and worship a creator (not The Creator). Our planet is full of people groups, each with their own local deity … each regarded as a creator. All are man-made gods, but none are God.
I know little about the Muslim world. But what little I know of its “scripture,” the god it describes simply does not resemble the God of the Bible.
I have tremendous difficulty in viewing them as the same deity.
I’m on the run and don’t have time to research and develop a comment. I’ll have to check back later tonight.
Thanks for clearly presenting your understanding and giving us a glimpse into the difficult world of evangelism among the Muslims.
Geoff
Brother Geoff,
First, I would take exception to the idea that people groups who attempt to worship a creator god are worshipping a man made God. Paul makes it clear in Romans 1 that God’s “eternal power and divine nature” are know through creation. The name they use for God is irrelevant. What is relevant is that they accept the Scriptures as the only further revelation of who the Creator is. (Don Richardson’s book Eternity in their Hearts is a simple book that may shed some light on this.)
While presenting a “different God” instead of building on the understanding of the Creator is definitely valid and is acceptable methodology, I see no reason to disallow building upon what is already known. In other words…
While what you propose is certainly valid, it is not necessarily the ONLY way of doing things. I would bring Paul’s lowest common denominator of the Creator’s “eternal power and divine nature” from Romans 1 to the witness stand as well as his proclamation, to a group of polytheists, of a God they were worshipping and knew of… but did not know!
In addition, I would say that there is only one Creator. As long as we make it clear what we believe about this Creator, either approach is valid. But why not start with what is know and build upon that?
I am curious as to what lowest common denominator you would suggest we use to differentiate between categories 3 & 4?
I was up late and need another cup of coffee before I’m completely lucid so please let me know if my answer does not make sense.
His peace be yours,
From the Middle East
Brother Geoff,
PS – Great question!!
Brother Geoff,
One other thought about creating a category four. If we apply the illustration of our purple-skinned man to your suggestion…
Well, sir, you did not meet the real purple-skinned man named Bill. That’s just your imagination. In reality there is another man name Bill with purple skin. What you thought you saw was not real. There is a completely different person with the name of Bill and purple skin. And he is the real one.
We already established there is only one person with the characteristic of purple skin. We are questioning the new acquaintance’s senses. The thing is, he actually DID see purple skin, he just got a glimpse. In the same way, Muslims have actually seen that there is a Creator… but their concept of Him needs clarification and correction!
His peace be yours,
From the Middle East
Mr (or Ms) Author (can I call you “Guest”?):
When folks get bent out of shape at the word Allah used in reference to God (not god), I remind them of 2 Timothy 2:14.
So in developing these “minimums” are we allowed to consult the Koran to see what the prophet of this deity wrote and compare them against ONLY the minimums?
Or would “God is love” be left out since the god revealed by the Koran could never meet that (for me) minimum?
I’ve having trouble with this, but really do want to understand. I fear, and again this is simply my understanding at this point, that this is driven by more pragmatic concerns than Scripture.
Trying to learn,
David
Brother Bob,
Agreed, but we must still strive for a biblical definition of who He is.
Another one that comes to mind is 1 Timothy 2:5.
His peace be yours,
From the Middle East
i, like david b., have trouble with calling God…”allah.” the “allah” of the koran is nothing like the One, True God of the bible. i know that they are alluding back to the Creator of the universe, and they consider the prophets of the ot as prophets. but, their god is definitely a different god than the God of the bible.
but, it’s just like the god of the jews of our day. the god that they now worship is not the God of the bible. the jewish worshippers no longer worship the One, True God of the bible. they have rejected Him, and they have gone to a false religion. but, the jewish people at one time did worship the One, True God….the muslims never have. they have been involved in a false religion from the get-go.
i just dont see how we could keep this straight in the minds of the muslim people… that their allah is not the One, True God….when our missionaries call Him “allah.” can you help me to see it?
david
Brother David,
Excellent question(s).
I would argue for using the Bible to determine minimums. Then we look for anything in their understanding of God that would sacrifice these minimums (more than one of him, not all powerful, not eternal, etc). If there are none, then we build upon this understanding. Please keep in mind that these minimums are what we would term “general revelation.” It does not mean they have it all together… obviously they do not. What it means is that they have a concept of a creator that meets the biblical minimums for this being to be considered the Creator. We then build on this understanding. The key here is that we always declare who God is and challenge their understanding of who He is. Yes, we believe in the Creator, but we believe He is loving….
With regards to God being a god of love. I definitely agree that He is and, along with you, do not see God being loving (by the biblical definition) in the Qur’an. But I would not put this in the minimums category. The reason I would not also answers the question of whether or not this approach is Scriptural or simply pragmatic. The reason is based upon the Apostles’ example. Paul did not require someone to understand God’s love for them to be considered rebellious to the Creator in Romans 1. Nor did he require the Stoics to have an understanding of God’s love prior to his preaching Christ to them on Mars Hill.
I would further argue that the Apostles were always pragmatic in their preaching of the Gospel. We see this most evidently in Paul because he dealt with a greater variety of worldviews and philosophies. The Gospel was always proclaimed, but the audience was also considered. But that is another conversation ;^)
His peace be yours,
From the Middle East
PS – Just out of curiosity, when you interact with Deists, do you proclaim a different god? Or do you proclaim that, in reality, God is knowable, does interact with humanity and even desires a relationship with humanity?
Brother David (007),
Good questions.
First, I agree that some/many of the characteristics of the Creator in the Qur’an are different than those He has revealed in the Bible. But that is not the question. The question is whether or not we have enough common ground to say He is the Creator.
You said:
but, it’s just like the god of the jews of our day. the god that they now worship is not the God of the bible. the jewish worshippers no longer worship the One, True God of the bible. they have rejected Him, and they have gone to a false religion
Bingo!!! You nailed it.
So, they are not Christians. If someone is not a Christian, they are not truly worshipping God. Agreed. Now we must determine if they are in category two or three and then proclaim the Gospel to them.
Which category would you place orthodox Jews in? And why? Please remember, your reasoning should be based upon their beliefs.
Peace to you,
From the Middle East
Brother David (007),
With regards to the word “Allah:”
This article is written with the presupposition that Allah is an acceptable term. I do not desire to discuss that here. If you are not okay with the word itself, you will have to address this with literally ALL Arabic-speaking Christians. It is the Arabic word for God – even in the Bible. This word was in use (by Christians) prior to Muhammad’s birth. I would challenge you to reconsider your hesitation to use this word or, to be consistent, stop using the word God in english as the Mormons use this word and their concept of God is even further away from the Bible than the Muslim concept.
His mercy be yours in abundance,
From the Middle East
PS – After re-reading my response, it seems a little harsh. Please understand that I do not mean it this way, but don’t have time to re-type it now. Sorry brother!
“PS – Just out of curiosity, when you interact with Deists, do you proclaim a different god? Or do you proclaim that, in reality, God is knowable, does interact with humanity and even desires a relationship with humanity?”
The latter.
Thanks for your help in understanding this. I hope you understand the struggle I have seeing this w/o cultural bias.
I do not think appeals to the use of the word Allah in the preChristian world helps. After reading your thoughts, I suppose what I’m trying to grasp here is the concept of a shared word (Allah) that has different meanings to the speaker and recipient. (as God does with Mormons)
In your experience then, does the shared use of “Allah” result in a helpful progression toward a Biblical understanding of God in his Biblical persons? Or by this use of a word that means (outside your minimums) radically different understandings, come off as a bait and switch once you move on. A Mars Hill “just a babbler” moment perhaps.
I have to again say that because of what Islam has come to be to me, I don’t really want to use anything associated with it. But I’m very interested in seeing those trapped within it come to know Jesus.
David Wilson
I’m sorry if what I just wrote is outside what you wanted to discuss here. The post previous to mine came in while I was writing.
David Wilson
FTME,
I don’t have any definitive answers for your questions, though it seems to me your general presentation here is on target.
I do think that the following passage is important (if not the most important) in thinking biblically on your questions:
John 4:21-14
Jesus declared, “Believe me, woman, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.”
My questions, on the basis of this passage, are:
1. To what degree is there a parallel between the religious situation of the Samaritans in the time of Jesus and the Muslims today?
2. What implication does the statement of Jesus that “salvation is of the Jews” have related to the degree of authenticity (or lack thereof) of Jewish worship today?
Linguistically, isn’t Allah just the Arabic for “God” – related to El or Elohim.
There is no other term in Arabic for God, is there?
The God of the Bible is not the same as the god of Islam. But the term for both is the same.
My Arabic is limited (ie. nonexistant) but my understand is that Allah is a designation (like God, Lord, etc) not a name (like Yahweh).
“the name they use for God is irrelevant.”
Was rereading the thread. Can someone unpack that for me through the lens of Scripture? I don’t want to go all JW here, but given the diluted understanding of the generic “god” word in both English and other languages, would it be helpful to instead from the beginning to use another name that perhaps you could infuse meaning into? Much like what happened when in order to eliminate confusion with the gods of Egypt, Yahweh self identified Himself outside those names attached to gods that He was not in any sense the same as?
Could you use that as a foundation that embraces the minimums then add the rest of the character of God from the Scripture, rather than doing the opposite with Allah and the Muslim understanding which you would have to subtract and add to in order to wind up with the God we know.
Thinking…
David Wilson
Okay, how many more Davids are going to get in on this!
Brother David Miller,
Correct. The term Allah is not a name like John or Frank or David ;^) Allah, literally translated means The God. There is no other word in Arabic for God. To not believe in Allah in the Arabic-speaking world is to be an atheist, pantheist or polytheist. Jews, Christians and Muslims all use the same term.
The word does, however, have different meanings to each one of the above-mentioned groups. Similar to God meaning different things to Mormons, Jews and Christians.
Peace to you,
From the Middle East
david rogers,
in answer to #2 of your comment, the jews worship became a false worship when they rejected Jesus as the Messiah…i’d say upon His arrest and crucifixion…maybe even sometime before this. now, jews worship a god of thier own making.
ftme,
thank you for your clear answers. i will ponder on those for a while.
david
david rogers,
in fact, where is that verse where it says that Jesus turned from the nation of israel, or was not going to offer Himself to the leaders of the jews from that time on. i cant remember the exact wording, nor exactly how it says it, but the meaning was that Jesus wasnt offering Himself to the nation of israel anymore….
can someone help me with this? i just cant seem to pull it up in my mind?
david
The gospel is an offense. But we don’t have to be. I sometimes think some of us misunderstand that. When you are speaking to a Muslim, why not use the term for God he knows. Then, as you share the gospel, help him to understand the real God of the Bible, as the Spirit opens his heart.
How many Muslims are we going to win by starting out by being offensive about the designation God?
I have friends who are anonymous missionaries in a Muslim country. They said that the key was to build relationships and then show grace. Islam (at least in their area) had no concept of grace. When you live in grace, speak in grace and love sacrificially, that is the best advertisment the gospel can receive.
Brother David Wilson,
I completely understand your struggle. And it is similar, if not identical, to what I went through. Prior to studying Arabic, Islam and Paul’s varying delivery of the Gospel… I felt the same way. One thing to remember is that there are a lot of presuppositions on your part concerning Islam. They may not be inaccurate, but interaction with Muslims is the only thing that will verify or change them.
Let’s take this question first, “In your experience then, does the shared use of “Allah” result in a helpful progression toward a Biblical understanding of God in his Biblical persons?”
Yes. Just as a Deist does not understand the Creator, or God. But does realize everything here did not just happen and that there could only be one such creative Being, Muslims have this in common with us. They, just like Deists, come to the table with presuppositions that must be confronted. But there is no reason to cease using the term. We should affirm them in their uncompromising belief that there is only one God. This provides opportunity to then expound upon that.
Phrases like, “God is like…” or “The Prophet Jeremiah tells us that God is….” or “Have you considered that Jesus…” or “That reminds me of when….” are what helps Muslims come to an understanding of who this Creator is.
Now, to address the question of bait-and-switch. No, they do not feel this way. If you try to explain how you don’t believe in Allah but do believe in the God of the Bible, they will be utterly confused. There is no difference to them in the God who gave revelation to Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. We do not completely agree with this, but it is a starting point. I wouldn’t even know how to express this concept in Arabic. You either believe in God or you don’t.
Hope that helps. This comment is already long, I’ll make another to address the other comment.
May His face shine upon you,
From the Middle East
Brother David Wilson,
Re: Comment #16:
My first question would be, what examples in Scripture do we have for this? The second question would be, what are the similarities and differences between Islam and that particular religion.
The example of polytheistic Egypt is not really comparable in my opinion. Primarily because they were polytheistic. On a side note, the Athenians were also polytheistic when Paul proclaimed the “unknown god” to them…. guess you can’t put God in a box!
With regards to the last paragraph. I have no problem with someone doing that. I have tried and received blank stares. When reading the Scriptures I never see the Apostles trying to get monotheists to switch gods. Rather, they are proclaiming a fuller understanding of the Creator. That being said, I see no prohibition in Scripture and if it helps Muslim understand God, go for it! My question would be, “Why do this if they already have an understanding of the Creator?” Just as the deist has to be confronted with false understandings, so must the Muslim… but this does not negate their affirmation of general revelation.
I do think you make a great point in saying that the word “God” can be diluted in English as well. In the South, many “believe” in God, yet do not know Him. They affirm Him as Creator and are monotheistic in belief, yet do not know their Creator. I would place many people I’ve met in churches in category three. Scary! But the practical question is, if we throw out the word “Allah” in Arabic, should we also throw out the english word “God?”
From your perspective, what should the minimums be?
Thinking with you brother,
From the Middle East
Brother David Rogers,
Re: Comment #14…
Regarding the first question, I do not feel adequately versed in first century Samaritan beliefs/practice to answer the question. However, it does intrigue me. I may look into this over the next few months. Any resources you would recommend? The one thought I do have after reading about their belief system on wikipedia is that they obviously distorted Old Testament teachings…. even changing the tenth commandment. This coupled with Jesus saying they worshipped that which they did not know strikes me as odd. They distorted the Scriptures, yet Jesus said they were worshipping the God of the Scriptures….???? I wonder what Jesus’ lowest common denominator was in this instance?
Regarding your second question and salvation being “from the Jews.” I’m not completely clear on the question. But, I do think the Samaritan woman has profound insight and recognizes that Jesus is speaking of the Messiah… the One coming from the Jews – Salvation! Jewish denial of the Messiah causes God to reject their worship. Was that the question? ;^)
His grace be yours in abundance,
From the Middle East
Brother David Miller,
Amen.
David Worley and FTME,
I wasn’t myself suggesting any particular answers to my questions. Just thinking out loud. As I thought about this passage, the phrase “salvation is from the Jews” jumped out at me as potentially significant.
FTME,
Just out of curiosity, I was wondering if there are any Christian workers (misguided or not) in Muslim lands who insist on not using the name Allah? If so, what
alternative(s) might they suggest?
Brother David,
My experience is almost exclusively among Arabic-speaking peoples. I know of no missionaries (from any organization) using a word other than Allah for God.
May His face shine upon you,
From the Middle East
FTME,
Very interesting. I wonder what alternative those who are making such a big deal about not using the name Allah might suggest?
Anyone else out there know?
FTME,
Right you are, but using the right name for God doesn’t let us off the hook for that, if that’s all we say about Him.
His name.
Sadly, methinks that’s the case in far, far too many Christians (you can say “Baptists” instead). They don’t say anything else about Him.
Brother Bob,
Good point. The Good News is not that there is a Creator (this is evident to all of humanity). Rather, the Good News is there is a way to know Him!
Brother David Rogers,
Good question.
May His face shine upon you,
From the Middle East
FTME, this is a fantastic, thought provoking post. I appreciate your insight and desire to address this issue assertively, but graciously as well. I especially appreciate the tone of the interaction on this post. It reminds me a lot of David Rogers at Love Each Stone. Good stuff.
I do have a question that isn’t directly related to your post, but has to do with some thoughts in one of the comments. I’m hoping you might have some knowledge of early Arabic translations of the Bible and can shed some light on this. If not, no worries. I read that Arab Jews used “Allah” when translating the Talmud pre 6th century. I’m wondering if this also applied to the Torah/OT, or if Arab Christians used it pre-Islam when translating the New Testament. I’m also pretty curious if the Arabs at Pentecost used “Allah” when referring to Yahweh. That may be unanswerable, but it perked my curiosity. Any insight on the history of Arabic and its use in translating the Bible pre-Islam?
Brother Patrick (and everyone else),
Great question. I do not have time to respond as I leave tomorrow for 2 1/2 weeks of exploratory work among a couple of unreached people groups. It is a good question and I will attempt to get you some hard answers upon returning.
May His face shine upon you,
From the Middle East
Brother Patrick,
One more thing. Comparing me to the amazing David Rogers himself… now I need to repent of pride!!
His peace be yours in abundance,
From the Middle East
FTME, Remember I said “reminds” me of David Rogers!! You’re not there just yet my friend
Also, if you’re going to respond to my question in the comments here, please shoot me an email to let me know if you don’t mind. If you’d like to just shoot me an email in response that would be fine too. But I’m thinking others might appreciate your thoughts on that as well.
Blessings, and enjoy your trip!
I can’t see how in the name of sense we can say that the Jews worship a different God than I do. Sorry, volfan, I respect your wisdom and seniority on the Christian ladder, so I’m not meaning to be improper… The God of the Old Testament has never changed, and never will. They worship Jehovah. They worship Yahweh. Granted, they do not worship Him through His Son Jesus Christ, so their worship is now in vain, but He is STILL THE SAME GOD. To maintain that they are worshipping a different God is absolutely absurd. I simply cannot accept that “men created gods”. That’s impossible. God is God, and other “gods” are either demons or completely inanimate objects or ideas. We cannot create “gods”. We do not have that capability. We can IDOLIZE anything at all, but we CANNOT create a god. We can MAKE something – anything – into a god and idolize it, but we have not CREATED a god. There’s a tremendous difference. Baal, Molech, etc., were and are idols which were often empowered by demons. Men didn’t create that power.
To claim, with any authority, that the Jews are now worshipping a different God than Jehovah seems to me to be terribly altering the course of Biblical history and I can’t come to terms with such a thought pattern. This implies that God’s everlasting covenant with Abraham was displaced and an evil “god” (???) stepped in and took the place of Yahweh. I simply cannot fathom this. Even if the Jews are now cursed and the covenant is strictly with the spiritual seed of Abraham – which I personally believe it IS, even though I think there is also a covenant with the physical seed – I find it hard to believe, based on my understanding of Scripture, that God yielded his position, title, and trusteeship as the Yahweh of the OT. No, sorry, can’t buy this one.
I don’t by any means think I can take the place of FTME, but being in a similar ministry situation has left me with some insights.
Everyone needs to reread comment #21: “I have friends who are anonymous missionaries in a Muslim country. They said that the key was to build relationships and then show grace. Islam (at least in their area) had no concept of grace. When you live in grace, speak in grace and love sacrificially, that is the best advertisment the gospel can receive.”
That is true no matter what false religion you are dealing with. That, in and of itself, affirms what FTME is saying. May other religions exist and many hold to one Creator, but how do we approach these people? We use the words they understand, but through our lives and teachings we change the meaning. Even in the South, we start with what people know and then move them toward the Truth. (i.e. saying a prayer at a revival meeting because it was the ‘right’ thing to do doesn’t mean you know God.) Everyday I use four different words for God and four different words for Jesus in an attempt to help people understand the Gospel. Even in all of that, it mostly comes down to showing grace and love. That is what helps them understand. (By the way, we use our local language, French, Arabic, and a little English.)
Also, let’s all remember our etymology, take away our cultural misgivings about the word Allah, and just remember that millions of Christians more devout than many of us pray to Allah everyday.