Something to Think About: Ministry Teams
Posted by Rob Ayers in Bible & Theology, Church & Missions
In I Corinthians 12, which is a clear chapter on ecclesiology, the apostle Paul integrates the individual within the body of Christ. The topic of discussion is spiritual gifts and their use in the church. The Corinthian church reportedly was emphasizing certain spiritual gifts as superior, at the exclusion of others deemed unimportant. The writer attempts to dissuade the church from overindulgence in certain gifts by proclaiming that the giver of the gifts is God, who distributes these “gifts of grace” according to His desire in the church. Not everyone will receive the same gift because gifts are distributed according to God’s desire. Each individual gift is important for the work of the body as a whole. Without this distribution, the church would not have the capacity to function well. Paul uses the body analogy in explaining the church is a body with various different parts. Not one part can work without the other.
Paul emphasizes an important point in verse 26: “And if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it; if one member is honored, all the members rejoice with it.” When a part of the human body is hurting, it usually requires attention, whether it is a bandage or intervention by a physician. Such is the body of Christ: when one individual suffers, then all individuals in the body suffer with them, requiring compassion, and, sometimes, intervention.
In application, this Scripture supports the idea of a “team concept” of ministry. Not one member has the ability to accomplish the task alone. Only a team effort (and that team effort is in the church) can see that the ministry is accomplished for the greater good. This Scripture also supports intervention ministry in crisis, for “if one member suffers, all the members suffer with it.” And certainly in extension, a “team” of ministers, working together by coalescing their differing gifts, can make short thrift of any task placed before them, since they are benefiting from a “synergistic” effect.
And yet, our historical Baptist polity has gathered itself along the lines of political expediency and individual ambition rather than Christian community. The advent of “committees” that perform various functions of minutia rather than communities working toward Kingdom goals has always been an issue in the Baptist Zion. Like my friend Geoff, I see many Christians believing that buying flowers for the sanctuary is performing a work for Christ rather than witnessing and ministering to others in need. Of course, like all “committees,” those that are placed upon them are because the person “wants to be on it” despite their personal spiritual gift, or for reasons of expediency – they are the only ones we can find who will not say no.
It is upon this principle in which I believe the next Baptist reformation will stand. Churches, traditional and non-traditional, who place emphasis on believers in finding their gifts, and then using their gifts in an appropriate ministry setting will providentially prosper. Committees are passé and are a part of an old culture which in many ways is no longer functional.
Now the hard work – encouraging a change in paradigm. In fact, it really is not new. It is based upon the clear teaching of Scripture. I would be interested if anyone has some insight on how this emphasis might go forward in our more traditional churches – or in fact, you just like committees – I would like to hear that too.



We’ve been doing this for about 10 years. I think we happened into it, not by design, but as a by-product of something the LBC promoted then. It was a plan to get the gospel into every heart & home in Louisiana. As a part of that process, some churches went through a process of seeking God’s vision for the church. People were placed on teams to minister and prepare for a week of prayer, seeking God, and planning. That process just kind of continued. However, when we tried calling these groups “teams” we entered the area of Baptist semantics. So now we don’t call them ministry teams. We just call them ministry leaders, and those who are part of those ministries. Sometimes we have a difficult time with organization. Sometimes the lines are a little foggy, but usually it works.
We have had a rather interesting journey in this area in our short 5 1/2 years of existence at Crossroads.
Our sponsoring church was big on the “spiritual gift inventories.” They followed the PDC 101, 201, 301 … to the letter. One phase of that was “discovering” the spiritual gift through one of the “color the dots” inventories.
My original core group could rattle off that they had this gift and that … but my question was always, “So … what are you doing with it?” The problem was that those gifts were not being utilized well.
So a couple of years ago I decided to try something different. I cast a vision for about twelve ministries in our community where I saw a distinct need. (This was our community, mind you, not our church. One of the first things we did was to clarify that ministry happened outside the walls of the church … not on Sunday morning.) I wrote up brief job descriptions for each and posted them on a board with five blanks for prospective ministry team leaders.
These teams filled rather quickly, and others were added, as well. i found that people gravitated toward the ministries where their spiritual giftedness was the strongest. We currently have toe following active community ministry teams: Food & Clothing, Pregnancy Care, Home Repair, Angel Food, Ministries to Educators, and a handful of others. Some of the original teams are now a bit inactive. Your post has awakened in me a desire to nudge them back into service.
As far as making this type of thing happen in the traditional church, I just don’t know. I think the idea of “committees” and “committees on committees” is simply too entrenched. Again (like our discussion of business meetings
) I see the committee-based structure as simply another mechanism that “fools” people into thinking they are doing their part for the kingdom … by meeting, planning, and casting votes to bring recommendations back to the church. Ministry so often gets lost in the mechanism.
Geoff,
“Ministry gets lost in the mechanism.” – Nice line!
I think you might be surprised at what is going on in the “traditional” church. Many of our churches are moving to a team approach to ministry. In fact, I was recently at a training event for new Directors of Missions and one of the main sessions was on working through teams. So it seems many are headed in that direction despite having to give up on fun groups like the “committee on committees” and the “nominating committee.”
And that is a good thing!
Our slogan for organizing ministries is, “We have ministries when we have ministers.” And then we make sure a regularly remind ourselves that ministry means service, and that ministers are servants.
Cyle
So who’s going to put the flowers in the sanctuary?
Hey Rob…that’s basically how our rather traditional church does stuff now. Folks who are gifted to teach, teach. Administrate, administrate. Serve, serve. And no matter what committee they are on, they still serve in other places as their gifts lead them to serve. When ministers minister, they are serving–in or out of the building. And all too often we are never aware of the little acts of service folks do beyond the walls of church. If I hadn’t discovered my friends scrubbing floors the other day at my other friend’s house, I dare say no one would have known unless Becky had made it known.
And when two ladies came and cleaned my home and did all my laundry when my husband had his heart attack, few people knew about that and they wouldn’t have had it any other way. And when another brother comes and mows my lawn, it is a testimony to my neighbors of the love he has for us. They are lost and it is wonderful to point to the acts of ministry our church does for us.
Can’t tell you how many ministry teams we have. Some are very visible. Others not. selahV
[...] September 19, 2007, Rob Ayers wrote a post entitled, “Something to Think About: Ministry Teams.” Rob did a good job of presenting the case for “gift-based” ministry. I love Rob as a [...]